| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
KPCB
|
Analyst subject |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Gibson
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipients of Chinese funding
|
Funding employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CIA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Trump administration
|
Governmental budgetary |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
KPCB
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
KPCB
|
Publisher author |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Presentation Subject (Likely FC2 Manufacturer)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth Cole
|
Chair sponsor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Litsch
|
Contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
KPCB
|
Project collaboration presentation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
KPCB
|
Analyst |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional inter agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | N/A | Projected crossover point where entitlement spending + interest payments exceed total revenue | USA | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 646-10, an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII), in case 13-1388-cr in the United Sta... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2020-12-28 | N/A | Decision made not to extend the seal on the Ghislaine Maxwell DNH triggerfish warrant. | DNH/SDNY | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Distribution of signed affidavit and search warrant for SDNY premises (relates to the arrest of G... | New York / New Hampshire | View |
| 2020-03-02 | N/A | Start period for the request to keep accounts open. | New York / Tampa | View |
| 2020-03-02 | N/A | Grand jury subpoena served upon USAA Bank. | Unknown | View |
| 2014-02-24 | Legal filing | Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Dau... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2010-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case: Amnesty Int’l USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479 | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1929-01-01 | N/A | Great Depression | USA | View |
An email chain from June 2020 between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) discussing legal strategy in the Epstein case. Key topics include the logistics of filing in a US Virgin Islands court without being admitted there, a specific desire to avoid asking the local US Attorney's Office for assistance, and considerations regarding the disclosure of trust agreements and privacy concerns. One participant is identified as a Co-Chief of the Public Corruption Unit.
An email notification dated January 6, 2020, indicating that a sender accepted a calendar invitation for an 'Epstein Meeting' sent by an individual from the USANYS (United States Attorney's Office). The specific identities of the participants are redacted.
This document is an email chain forwarding a 'Notice of Electronic Filing' from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Epstein (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The notice, dated July 12, 2019, details a Memo Endorsement signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, which denied an application for an extension of time, noting that it was 'Hard to imagine it would take the Govt extra time to review submission.' The document includes standard ECF warnings and document stamp details.
This document is an email chain from March 2020 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the District of the Virgin Islands (USVI). The USVI office informs SDNY that they are opening an investigation into the Jeffrey Epstein Estate and Southern Country International Bank in conjunction with the FBI and IRS-CI. The chain concludes with SDNY US Attorney Geoffrey Berman expressing annoyance at receiving a direct email from a 'line assistant' at USVI regarding coordination, prompting an internal SDNY discussion to resolve the communication channel.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 detailing the coordination within the Department of Justice (SDNY and EOUSA) to approve international travel for an Assistant U.S. Attorney. The purpose of the trip to the U.K./London was to interview a victim of Jeffrey Epstein who would only speak in person, for the purpose of the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (misspelled 'Glaine' in the text). The correspondence discusses visa requirements, travel memos, and the necessity of the interview to preserve testimony for trial.
This document is an email header from November 18, 2020, forwarding a notification regarding activity in the criminal case 'USA v. Maxwell' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Specifically, it relates to a 'Memo Endorsement'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
This document is an email chain from March 2, 2020, involving an FBI Special Agent from the VCAC/Human Trafficking unit in New York. The agent requests a 'Keep Open Letter' for USAA bank regarding specific accounts. The correspondence provides identifiers (DOB and SSN, though redacted) for Ghislaine Maxwell (noted as aka Ghislaine Borgerson) and Scott Borgerson to facilitate this request.
This document is an email chain forwarding a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) from the U.S. District Court of New Hampshire regarding the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-mj-00132-AJ). The notice details a Removal Hearing held on July 2, 2020, before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone, where Ghislaine Maxwell waived her identity hearing. The document notes that a detention hearing is to be held in the prosecuting district.
This document is an email thread from July 22, 2020, between officials at the USAEO, SDNY, and DOJ regarding a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for Ghislaine Maxwell's mugshot. The officials discuss whether the photo exists and is releasable, with SDNY confirming they did not possess the photo at that time but expected to receive it soon for discovery production. They also discuss the protocol for handling such FOIA inquiries, including forwarding them to a specific point of contact.
This document contains email metadata dated December 8, 2020, regarding case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Maxwell). It captures internal communication between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) concerning a letter related to the case activity. The specific identities of the senders and recipients are redacted.
This document is an email chain from November and December 2021 regarding the scheduling of an AT&T custodian to testify in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The AT&T Court Appearance Team confirms that a custodian is likely needed on December 8-9, 2021. The document includes the footer EFTA00022195.
This document is an email chain from August 2020 involving legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, etc.) and likely government prosecutors (names redacted). The discussion concerns a discovery letter sent by the defense, the handling of criminal grand jury materials in relation to Maxwell's civil cases, and a dispute over the disclosure of victim names. The redacted senders discuss strategy for responding to 'Jeff and Laura,' specifically refuting claims of government malfeasance and debating whether to allow materials to be filed under seal.
An email chain from July 22, 2020, involving DOJ and USAEO staff discussing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for Ghislaine Maxwell's mugshot. The correspondence clarifies that the Southern District of New York (SDNY) does not possess the mugshot and discusses the procedure for handling such inquiries. The initial sender from the FOIA/PA staff in D.C. notes that the photo is not circulating on the internet and seeks verification of its existence and releasability.
This document is an email dated January 12, 2021, forwarding a notification regarding legal activity in the case 'USA v. Maxwell' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The email concerns the transmission of a Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to the United States Court of Appeals (USCA). The sender and primary recipients are redacted, though 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' is visible in the BCC field.
An email notification dated November 23, 2021, confirming the acceptance of a submission (labeled 227815.002) related to the criminal case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 CR 330). The email is addressed to a 'testimony' account, suggesting it relates to witness testimony or evidence submission for the trial.
This document is an email chain dated August 10, 2019, between government officials (likely DOJ/FBI) tracking the events of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The emails confirm the timeline of the BOP notifying officials first of an ambulance transfer for an 'apparent suicide attempt' and subsequently confirming that 'Epstein has passed.' An official mentions heading to the MCC to gather more information.
An email dated August 11, 2020, discussing legal correspondence regarding 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell). The email lists attachments related to defense motions concerning victim identities, prison privileges, and a protective order. The sender notes that Judge Nathan has set a deadline for Thursday and mentions an upcoming team meeting.
This document is an automated email notification from Box.com dated January 22, 2020. It indicates that a redacted user invited a collaborator with a US Department of Justice related email address (via the USAfx system) to access a digital folder titled 'Epstein Death'. This suggests ongoing file sharing regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death.
This document is a formal discovery letter from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated August 5, 2020. It lists a comprehensive index of evidence provided to the defense, including financial records from multiple banks (Citibank, Chase, TD Bank, etc.), travel records (flight manifests and airline records), email account records (Oath, Microsoft, Google), and corporate filings (USVI, Delaware). While the document *lists* the existence of flight manifests and financial records, it is an index only and does not contain the specific content (flight paths, transaction amounts) within the document itself.
An email thread between investigators dated December 31, 2019, discussing the pursuit of Ghislaine Maxwell. Investigators discovered an account (likely Amazon) via USAA statements and requested a subpoena and Non-Disclosure Order (NDO) to track her packages and determine her physical location. The email reveals Maxwell was using the alias 'Ghislaine Borgerson' on the credit card used for these transactions.
This document contains an email chain between a partner at Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal authorities (SDNY/FBI) from late 2018/early 2019. The correspondence outlines preparations for a new investigation or prosecution, including requests for victim lists beyond those in the original Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Crucially, it provides a comprehensive list of lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epstein, his pilots, staff, and Ghislaine Maxwell, noting that Bruce Reinhart (now a magistrate judge) represented the pilots and staff.
This document is a redacted email dated June 28, 2019, confirming the acceptance of a meeting titled 'Epstein Press Meeting'. The sender and recipient identities are obscured by black bars, though the email header suggests it passed through a government or organizational Exchange server (indicated by '_o=USA').
This document is an Order to Produce and Protective Order issued in August 2008 by Judge Kenneth A. Marra of the Southern District of Florida. It grants a motion by Petitioners (Jane Does 1 and 2) to compel the US Attorney's Office to produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement made with Jeffrey Epstein. The order includes strict protective measures, prohibiting the disclosure of the agreement's terms to third parties without further court order and providing a mechanism for other identified victims to review the agreement under the same confidentiality terms.
A 14-page letter from attorney Stephanie D. Thacker to DOJ official John Roth arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Thacker contends the case lacks federal jurisdiction (no interstate travel for illegal purposes, no commercial sex trafficking) and should remain a state matter. She highlights credibility issues with witnesses who admitted to lying about their age and accuses the lead detective of omitting exculpatory evidence in search warrant affidavits.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | USA | Unknown | $9,000,000,000,000.00 | Outstanding Debt Level | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Paid | USA | N/A | $997,000,000,000.00 | F2009 revenue shortfall (excluding one-time dis... | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Received | Multiple redacted... | USA | $915,000,000,000.00 | F2009 total income tax receipts from individuals | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity