USA
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
KPCB
|
Analyst subject |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Gibson
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipients of Chinese funding
|
Funding employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CIA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Trump administration
|
Governmental budgetary |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
KPCB
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
KPCB
|
Publisher author |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Presentation Subject (Likely FC2 Manufacturer)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth Cole
|
Chair sponsor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Litsch
|
Contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
KPCB
|
Project collaboration presentation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
KPCB
|
Analyst |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional inter agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | N/A | Projected crossover point where entitlement spending + interest payments exceed total revenue | USA | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 646-10, an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII), in case 13-1388-cr in the United Sta... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2020-12-28 | N/A | Decision made not to extend the seal on the Ghislaine Maxwell DNH triggerfish warrant. | DNH/SDNY | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Distribution of signed affidavit and search warrant for SDNY premises (relates to the arrest of G... | New York / New Hampshire | View |
| 2020-03-02 | N/A | Start period for the request to keep accounts open. | New York / Tampa | View |
| 2020-03-02 | N/A | Grand jury subpoena served upon USAA Bank. | Unknown | View |
| 2014-02-24 | Legal filing | Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Dau... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2010-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case: Amnesty Int’l USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479 | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1929-01-01 | N/A | Great Depression | USA | View |
EFTA00013480.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry record from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). It schedules a 'Hearing on Epstein Motion to Quash' for September 18, 2007, before Judge Marra. The record was organized by a user associated with 'AVILLAFANA' and includes redacted attendees from the USAFLS.
EFTA00010377.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2020 between the US Attorney's Offices for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the District of New Hampshire (USANH). The officials discuss a 'Triggerfish' warrant related to Ghislaine Maxwell in the District of New Hampshire (DNH). The final decision communicated is that there is no need to extend the seal on this warrant, allowing it to lapse.
EFTA00010376.pdf
This document is an email thread dated July 2, 2020, between individuals associated with the US Attorney's Office for the District of New Hampshire (USANH). The subject concerns a 'SDNY Premises Search Warrant Bundle (second revised) copy,' likely related to the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell which occurred on this date in New Hampshire. The email includes a PDF attachment of the warrant bundle.
EFTA00005932.pdf
This file contains a background investigation into a female subject (approx. 34 years old in 2019) residing in Astoria, NY. The documents include handwritten investigative notes suggesting she may be living abroad, a detailed flight history (TECS report) showing extensive international travel between 2010 and 2015 to destinations including Turkey, India, Italy, and Israel, and a TLOxp comprehensive background report. The report also notes a 2012 civil judgment against the subject by Capital One Bank.
DOJ-OGR-00008238.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing (Document 528) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 6, 2021. It is a legal memorandum arguing points regarding attorney-client privilege, specifically focusing on waiver and implied waiver. The text cites various legal precedents (United States v. Krug, In re von Bulow) to establish that privilege belongs to the client and cannot generally be waived by the attorney without consent, unless the client asserts an advice-of-counsel defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000900.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-770) covering March 22–24, 2021. It details the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail by Judge Alison J. Nathan and Maxwell's subsequent notice of appeal. Additionally, it contains a significant order regarding a defense subpoena directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, outlining the procedural requirements for victim notification and privacy protection under Rule 17(c)(3).
DOJ-OGR-00000898.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 (related to Ghislaine Maxwell) covering filings between February 4, 2021, and February 16, 2021. It details numerous defense motions filed by Maxwell's legal team (Cohen, Pagliuca) to dismiss charges, suppress evidence, and strike surplusage, alongside multiple sealed documents. The log also records correspondence to Judge Nathan regarding conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000895.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 and early 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's bail application due to flight risk, citing specific charges including conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. The docket tracks correspondence between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Everdell), sealed documents, and Maxwell's subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal after a request for an extension of time was denied.
DOJ-OGR-00000893.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), listing entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020. It records the filing of transcripts from a July 2020 conference, an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions for Maxwell's sealed bail application based on privacy interests and judicial efficiency, and the submission of Maxwell's renewed bail motion with numerous exhibits. Additionally, it notes the appearance of attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government and the government's subsequent opposition to the bail application.
DOJ-OGR-00000891.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and a denied request for an in camera conference regarding a renewed bail motion. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders balancing privacy interests with public access, ultimately allowing tailored redactions to defense letters but denying the request to keep proceedings entirely sealed or in camera.
DOJ-OGR-00000890.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court docket in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various filings including letters regarding discovery deadlines, affidavits, mandates from the USCA dismissing an appeal, and several memo endorsements and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding discovery schedules and conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00000889.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings from September to November 2020. It chronicles a series of letters, motions, and orders between the prosecution (USA, represented by AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz) and the defense (Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorneys including Sternheim, Everdell, and Pagliuca), all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings primarily concern procedural matters such as requests to delay disclosure of evidence, modify protective orders, and confirm the government's disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00000888.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) listing filings and orders between August 18, 2020, and September 8, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records legal maneuvers including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letter motions regarding redactions and protective orders, and a Memorandum Opinion denying defense requests for victim identities and changes to confinement conditions. The page concludes with a notice of appeal filed by Maxwell regarding a previous memorandum and opinion.
DOJ-OGR-00000887.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering a period in August 2020. It details a judicial order denying a broad defense request regarding witness privacy and discovery materials, followed by a log of subsequent legal filings (motions, affidavits, and endorsements) between the defense team (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the prosecution (Rossmiller) regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders.
DOJ-OGR-00000886.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings and orders from late July 2020. It includes entries regarding motions for a protective order, responses from both the defense and prosecution, and a Memorandum Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan resolving disputes over the protective order's language concerning victim identification and the use of discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00000883.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket containing orders and notices related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details COVID-19 protocols for courthouse entry, remote proceeding logistics, victim notification rights, and Speedy Trial Act exclusions. It also lists a memo endorsement scheduling briefing deadlines and notices of attorney appearances for Maxwell's defense team.
DOJ-OGR-00000881.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 21-770 filed on March 24, 2021, identifies the plaintiff as the USA. It lists five attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York who are representing the plaintiff, providing their roles, contact information, and office addresses.
DOJ-OGR-00000862.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 covering the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail and her subsequent appeal of that decision. It also details a legal dispute regarding a defense subpoena targeting a law firm representing alleged victims, with Judge Nathan ordering the firm to formally file objections to protect victim privacy under Rule 17(c)(3). The document lists various filings including letters from prosecutors (AUSAs) and defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00000861.jpg
This document is a docket summary from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late February to mid-March 2021. Key events include Maxwell's third motion for bond, subsequent responses and replies, and a motion for a time extension which was granted. The document culminates in a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, addressing disputes over the redaction and sealing of pretrial motions and exhibits, setting deadlines for the parties to confer and propose joint redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00000860.jpg
This document is a court docket log from February 2021 for Case 21-770 involving Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the filing of numerous defense motions including attempts to suppress evidence, dismiss counts based on time-bars and a non-prosecution agreement, and strike surplusage. The log also records the filing of sealed documents and correspondence between attorneys (both defense and prosecution) and Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00000857.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering late December 2020 to mid-January 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail due to flight risk, referencing charges related to the enticement and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts. The document tracks subsequent procedural filings, including sealed documents and Maxwell's eventual filing of a Notice of Appeal on January 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000856.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the filing of opposition and reply memoranda regarding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, as well as Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders approving redactions to protect third-party privacy and ultimately denying the motion for release on bail on December 28, 2020. The text heavily cites legal precedents regarding judicial transparency versus privacy interests (Lugosch, Amodeo).
DOJ-OGR-00000855.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from Case 21-770, detailing events between December 10 and December 18, 2020, concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries primarily revolve around the filing of a court transcript, Maxwell's renewed application for bail, and the court's orders regarding the redaction of documents related to the bail application. The court, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan, approved Maxwell's proposed redactions to protect the privacy of individuals mentioned, balancing it against the public's right to access.
DOJ-OGR-00000853.jpg
This is a court docket sheet from December 2020 (entries 78-84) detailing proceedings in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and legal arguments concerning the sealing and redaction of defense letters. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring MDC counsel to submit information, approved specific redactions based on privacy interests, denied a request for an in-camera conference, and ordered three documents to be placed in a sealed vault.
DOJ-OGR-00000852.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 detailing procedural updates in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, extensions of discovery deadlines, and disputes over the disclosure of materials and Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC. Judge Nathan issued orders requiring the parties to confer regarding Maxwell's request for Warden Heriberto Tellez to address her detention concerns.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | USA | Unknown | $9,000,000,000,000.00 | Outstanding Debt Level | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Paid | USA | N/A | $997,000,000,000.00 | F2009 revenue shortfall (excluding one-time dis... | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Received | Multiple redacted... | USA | $915,000,000,000.00 | F2009 total income tax receipts from individuals | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity