Robert Critton
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
14
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Spencer Kuvin
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-12-13 | N/A | Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-05-18 | N/A | Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2010-01-27 | N/A | Judge Hafele rules deposition videos cannot be released without court order. | West Palm Beach | View |
| 2009-09-16 | N/A | Scheduled Deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 | 250 Australian Avenue South... | View |
| 2009-06-25 | N/A | Epstein's legal team filed a Motion to Stay Disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. | Palm Beach County Circuit C... | View |
| 2009-06-11 | N/A | Certificate of Service mailed to opposing counsel. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
023.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raised Objections' filed on May 20, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiff C.M.A. withdraws her objections to Jeffrey Epstein's motion to compel her to identify herself by her legal name in the case style and third-party subpoenas, though she maintains her objection to the case being dismissed sua sponte. The document lists numerous related cases involving Jane Doe plaintiffs and provides a service list of attorneys involved.
010.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Striking Docket Entry' filed on May 4, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, case Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff's counsel, Katherine W. Ezell of Podhurst Orseck, P.A., notifies the court that a previous docket entry was filed without a signature and has been re-filed correctly. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing numerous attorneys involved in this case and related cases against Epstein, including Bruce Reinhart (defense), Jack Scarola, and Brad Edwards.
008.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 101 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 1, 2009. The plaintiff agrees to the court's order to consolidate ten separate cases filed by various Jane Does and C.M.A. against Jeffrey Epstein for the purposes of discovery. The document includes a service list detailing the contact information for attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and the defendant.
EFTA00023624.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Notice of Serving Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories in a 2009 civil case against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff, whose name is redacted, details her residence history and her interactions with Epstein between 2002 and 2003, stating she visited his Florida home roughly twice a week to provide massages after being introduced by a friend. The document reveals she recruited other females for Epstein in exchange for payment, used drugs (Morning Glory, Angel Trumpets, cocaine, marijuana) during the relevant period, and lists various legal counsel and law enforcement entities involved in the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00030308.tif
This document is an invoice from Visual Evidence to Burman, Critton & Luttier, dated September 17, 2009, for services related to a videotaped deposition of Jane Doe #4 in the case 'Jane Doe #2 v Epstein'. The invoice details charges for tech time and digital tape stock, totaling $290.00, and notes that the master tape contained discussions among attorneys regarding the deposition's cancellation, with no copies retained by Visual Evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00032368.jpg
This document is a service list for the 2008 court case No. 50 2008 CA 006596 XXXX MB AB. It provides the names, law firms, and contact information for the attorneys representing various parties in the case. Key parties and their counsel include the State of Florida (represented by Lanna Belohlavek), Jeffrey Epstein (represented by Jack A. Goldberger and Robert Critton), Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce E. Reinhart), and Haley Robson (represented by Douglas M. McIntosh and Jason A. McGrath).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021664.jpg
This FBI FD-350 document preserves a January 27, 2010, Palm Beach Post article titled 'Judge rules Epstein attorneys can subpoena abortion records.' The article details Judge Donald Hafele's decision allowing Epstein's defense to access plaintiffs' medical records to challenge claims of emotional distress, despite privacy objections from the Presidential Women's Health Center. Additionally, the document notes a separate ruling restricting the release of deposition videos, referencing a leaked video concerning Epstein's anatomy.
Agreement to Motion
Undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, Robert Critton, Esquire, who graciously advised that we may represent to the Court that he is in agreement with this motion.
Motion for Enlargement of Time
Conferral regarding the motion; Mr. Critton advised Defendant does not oppose.
Enlargement of time
Counsel consulted regarding extension of time to file reply; Critton did not oppose.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity