Spencer Kuvin
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Robert Critton
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ted
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe (Client)
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 1
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Email Sender]
|
Criticized by |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Sun
|
Source media |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
C.L.
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ted
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Intervener [Redacted]
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-06 | N/A | Article published in The Sun quoting Spencer Kuvin. | Published Media | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place between attorneys for accusing witnesses and SDNY prosecutors concerning or r... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place where certain attorneys for accusing witnesses met with SDNY prosecutors to a... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2010-06-15 | N/A | Scheduled deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez (Subject to motion to quash). | Intelligent Office, 701 Bri... | View |
| 2010-04-20 | N/A | Date Mr. Kuvin served Maritza Milagros Vasquez with a subpoena. | Miami, FL | View |
| 2010-03-19 | N/A | Deposition of Detective Recarey regarding surveillance reports and chain of custody. | Unknown | View |
| 2009-09-04 | N/A | Court hearing for State of FL vs Jeffrey Epstein regarding 'St Check re opinion' (Status Check). | Palm Beach County Courthouse | View |
| 2008-08-13 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time. | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Jeffrey Epstein. | Palm Beach County Courthouse | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Epstein's sentencing hearing | Court | View |
065.pdf
Court minute sheet from September 4, 2009, for case 2008CF9381 (State of FL vs Jeffrey Epstein). The hearing was a status check regarding an opinion, presided over by Judge Catherine Brunson, with Epstein's defense team (Goldberger and Walsh) present. Attorneys William Berger and Spencer Kuvin (representing a redacted party) also participated, with Berger appearing via speakerphone.
055.pdf
This document is a transcript of court proceedings from June 26, 2009, regarding State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The hearing concerns a 'Motion to Stay' filed by Epstein's defense to prevent the immediate release of sealed documents, specifically a Non-Prosecution Agreement (MPA) and grand jury materials, pending an appeal. The Judge denies the indefinite stay and the request for a bond but grants a short delay until the following Thursday to allow the defense time to file with the appellate court. The document also touches on potential redactions of children's names, which the Judge notes were not actually found in the documents in question.
017-12.pdf
This document is an appeal by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein against a Magistrate's Order compelling him to produce discovery materials, including correspondence with prosecutors, tax returns, and passport/travel records. Epstein argues that producing these documents violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because he still faces a real threat of federal prosecution outside the Southern District of Florida, despite his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing also details privacy concerns for third parties (alleged victims), claims attorney work-product privilege over files selected by his defense counsel, and argues that his offer to stipulate to a high net worth renders the production of his tax returns unnecessary.
017-09.pdf
This document contains a Motion for Reconsideration filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in February 2010, arguing against a Magistrate's order compelling him to produce sensitive documents. The motion relies heavily on Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination, arguing that despite a Non-Prosecution Agreement, Epstein faces real risks of prosecution in other jurisdictions. Attached exhibits include the Plaintiff's 2009 requests for production of massage logs, photos of Epstein's Palm Beach home, financial records, and medical records from Dr. Stephan Alexander, to which Epstein consistently objected.
010-06.pdf
This document is Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's second amended supplemental response to discovery requests from Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 29, 2016. It details Giuffre's legal representation history from 2009 to 2016, listing specific attorneys and cases including actions against Jeffrey Epstein, the US Government, and Alan Dershowitz. The document also contains objections to requests for financial records regarding payments from Epstein or media organizations, asserting attorney-client privilege and irrelevance.
014.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 22, 2008, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Epstein's lawyers state they have no opposition to the plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Evidence (DE 12). However, they dispute the plaintiff's certification of compliance, arguing that plaintiff's counsel filed the motion prematurely without properly conferring with the defense or waiting for a return call regarding Epstein's position.
008.pdf
This document is a motion filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on August 8, 2008, requesting an extension to file a response to the complaint in the case of Jane Doe #1. Epstein's lawyers argue that the deadline should be aligned with parallel cases (Jane Doe Nos. 2-5) to September 4, 2008, to promote judicial economy. The document notes that co-defendants Haley Robson and Sarah Kellen had not yet been served at the time of filing.
008-01.pdf
A court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe #1 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants the Defendant's Motion to Align Response Date. Copies were furnished to several attorneys including Bruce Reinhart and Jack Goldberger.
EFTA00031937.pdf
A 2009 article from PalmBeachDailyNews.com details Jeffrey Epstein's release from Palm Beach County jail to serve one year of probation at his home without electronic monitoring. The article includes reactions from victims (Jane Doe No. 3 and No. 5) and their attorneys, who express outrage at the leniency of the sentence and fear of Epstein's wealth and influence. It also lists the specific conditions of his probation, including a curfew and restrictions on contact with minors.
EFTA00030511.pdf
An email dated July 30, 2019, circulating a South Florida Sun Sentinel article. The article discusses the legal conflict regarding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida, noting that while some victims want new charges in Florida following his New York arrest, prosecutors argue others wish to avoid reopening the case to protect their privacy. Lawyers for victims Jane Doe 1 and 2 argue that the privacy concerns of some should not prevent the prosecution of Epstein and his co-conspirators.
EFTA00023920.pdf
This document contains an email chain discussing a Daily Beast article titled 'Federal Prosecutors Are Lining Up Witnesses Against Jeffrey Epstein's Cronies'. The emails criticize attorney Spencer Kuvin for providing inaccurate information in media reports. The article details the ongoing federal investigation into Epstein's accomplices after his suicide, including meetings with victims and discussions about his assets and past legal proceedings, with an emphasis on the continued pursuit of co-conspirators.
EFTA00014661.pdf
This document contains an email exchange between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Laura Menninger, and US Prosecutors regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, which limits press statements. Menninger initially flags comments made by attorney Spencer Kuvin in 'The Sun' as a potential violation. The prosecution responds that Kuvin does not represent any trial witnesses, but counters that Maxwell's own appellate attorney, David Markus, may have violated the rule via statements to the 'NY Post'.
EFTA00014098.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 2008 between attorney Ted Leopold and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) regarding the 'Epstein Investigation.' The AUSA provides contact details and thanks Leopold for assistance. Leopold replies, copying attorney Spencer Kuvin, stating he will provide 'the names' the following day and asks Kuvin to meet with him.
EFTA00014096.pdf
This document contains an email chain between FBI agents and the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) in July 2008 regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses names found in 'message pads' that were not fully identified and expresses a belief that more victims will come forward following Epstein's conviction. It also includes an exchange with attorney Ted Leopold, who provides the names of two clients relevant to the investigation.
EFTA00014093.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from June and July 2008 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) and attorney Ted Leopold (cc'ing Spencer Kuvin). The correspondence involves the 'Epstein Investigation.' Ted Leopold provides the names of two clients (redacted) to the U.S. Attorney's office. The internal government emails discuss checking these names and attempting to contact the mother of a redacted individual.
EFTA00011418.pdf
This document is a discovery request letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Cohen & Gresser LLP, to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated October 13, 2020. The defense requests a wide range of materials including exculpatory Brady evidence, information on Minor Victims 1-3, communications regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and records of coordination between the government and civil attorneys representing Epstein's accusers. The letter also requests specific FBI files, unredacted reports, and evidence related to the credibility and potential financial motives of government witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00002725.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is a request for the production of documents related to defense motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It seeks all communications concerning the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, including those between various government agencies and Epstein's lawyers. The request also demands communications from meetings in 2016 and 2018 where attorneys for Epstein's victims urged the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to launch a criminal investigation into both Epstein and Maxwell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017972.jpg
This document is a court filing containing a Miami Herald article that details the 2008 sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights collusion between prosecutors and Epstein's defense to minimize the judge's awareness of other crimes and co-conspirators, specifically citing a 2007 email from federal prosecutor A. Marie Villafaña. It also notes that victims' attorney Spencer Kuvin was present by chance but was unaware the hearing would dispose of his client's case without their notification.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017809.jpg
This document is a page from a Miami Herald article filed as a legal exhibit in 2019, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 sentencing hearing. It highlights the coordination between prosecutors and Epstein's defense to minimize the judge's awareness of the scope of crimes and co-conspirators, noting specifically that victims' lawyers were not notified of the plea deal. The document includes a photo of the Palm Beach County facility where Epstein served his time and references emails proving federal prosecutors sought to limit information presented to the judge.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023049.jpg
This article from The Virgin Islands Daily News details the 'unusual level of collaboration' between federal prosecutors (including Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafana) and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team during the negotiation of his non-prosecution agreement. It highlights the exclusion of victims from the process, the 'VIP treatment' Epstein received in jail (including work release authorized by Sheriff Ric Bradshaw), and subsequent legal battles by victims like 'Jane Doe No. 1' (Wild) and Jena-Lisa Jones to invalidate the agreement. The document also reveals that in 2011, the NY District Attorney's office under Cyrus Vance argued on Epstein's behalf to reduce his sex offender status, a move that shocked the presiding judge.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022991.jpg
This document is a page from a news report (archived by the House Oversight Committee) discussing the connections between Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Alex Acosta. It highlights a 2002 quote from Trump praising Epstein and noting his interest in 'younger' women, which attorney Spencer Kuvin finds suspicious given Epstein's later convictions. The text also details Alex Acosta's defense of the lenient plea deal he arranged for Epstein while serving as U.S. Attorney, a topic raised during Acosta's confirmation hearings for Labor Secretary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021664.jpg
This FBI FD-350 document preserves a January 27, 2010, Palm Beach Post article titled 'Judge rules Epstein attorneys can subpoena abortion records.' The article details Judge Donald Hafele's decision allowing Epstein's defense to access plaintiffs' medical records to challenge claims of emotional distress, despite privacy objections from the Presidential Women's Health Center. Additionally, the document notes a separate ruling restricting the release of deposition videos, referencing a leaked video concerning Epstein's anatomy.
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File CIVIL RICO...
Filing of motion and service to counsel via CM/ECF or mail.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity