| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Starr
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Starr
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Starr
|
Corresponded |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Corresponded |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Communicated concern |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Communicated concern |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Roth told OPR he understood Epstein had reneged on the NPA and considered it a "dead letter," thu... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Roth discussed the Epstein matter with two senior staff colleagues and the Deputy Attorney General. | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-26 | Communication | Roth alerted the Office of the Attorney General about potential contact from Epstein's counsel an... | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-26 | N/A | Roth alerts Office of the Attorney General that Epstein's counsel might try to contact them for a... | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-26 | N/A | Roth informs OPR of his concern that Epstein's team would attempt further appeal to delay case re... | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-23 | N/A | Roth sends letter to Starr and Lefkowitz regarding USAO's review of the Epstein matter. | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-23 | Communication | Roth sent a letter to Starr and Lefkowitz regarding the conclusion of a review into the USAO's ha... | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-23 | Legal communication | Roth sent a letter to Starr and Lefkowitz concluding the federal review of the Epstein case. | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-03 | N/A | Sloman sent Roth a lengthy letter recounting negotiation history. | DOJ | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Review of Epstein case by Office of Deputy Attorney General (Roth and Filip). | Washington D.C. | View |
This document is a flight log for the aircraft N908JE (a G1159B) from August to September 1995, detailing various flights between locations like PBI, TEB, MVY, CMH, ASE, and SAF. It lists passengers including 'JE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein), 'GM', 'AS', Donald Trump, Paula Epstein, Jem Worden, and others, indicating multiple trips and passenger manifests.
This document details events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing from June 2008 to June 2009, including communications between various officials regarding the handling of his case and concerns about the terms of his plea agreement. It highlights discrepancies and objections raised by Villafaña regarding Epstein's proposed custody arrangements, suggesting a potential violation of the agreement's spirit.
This document details the internal review and communications surrounding the resolution of the Epstein case, particularly focusing on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights disagreements and varying interpretations among legal officials regarding Epstein's claims, the validity of the NPA, and the scope of federal involvement, including a reaction from Villafaña to the proposed 90-day jail term and Deputy Attorney General Filip's perspective on Epstein's arguments.
This document is a handwritten flight log page for a Gulfstream II (N908JE) covering the period from August 13, 1995, to September 21, 1995. The log details 19 flights piloted by David Rodgers (and occasionally Jim Worden), primarily shuttling between West Palm Beach (PBI), Teterboro (TEB), Martha's Vineyard (MVY), Columbus (CMH), and Aspen (ASE). A notable entry on August 13, 1995, lists Donald Trump and Eric Trump as passengers traveling with Jeffrey Epstein (JE) and Ghislaine Maxwell (GM) from PBI to TEB.
This document details events in late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's case, where federal authorities concluded their review and declined to intervene further. Subsequently, federal prosecutor Villafaña discovered the proposed state plea agreement's sentencing terms appeared to violate the federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by not requiring Epstein to be confined in the county jail, leading her to suspect foul play.
This document details communications from late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement. It begins with a letter from Roth to Epstein's counsel, Starr and Lefkowitz, confirming that federal prosecution is appropriate, and then shifts to prosecutor Villafaña's efforts to enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Villafaña expresses strong suspicion that Epstein's attorneys are misrepresenting the terms of his confinement, telling her he would be in a jail 24/7 while planning for him to be at a less restrictive 'stockade', which she reports to a colleague, Sloman, as a violation of their agreement.
This document appears to be a page (117) from a book manuscript or legal draft, likely authored by Alan Dershowitz given the context of the 'House Oversight' Bates stamp collection. The text argues against the censorship of pornography, critiquing a definition proposed by 'radical feminists' as too vague and potentially encompassing classic literature. The author posits that political censorship and the suppression of state secrets pose a greater threat to democracy than obscenity.
This document is a page (p. 311) from an academic text titled 'Morality Games,' discussing psychological and economic theories of reciprocity, self-image, framing effects, and anonymous giving. It bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a government investigation, likely collected due to the citation '(Rand & Epstein, 2014)' regarding altruism. The text analyzes why humans perform pro-social acts even when no reciprocation is possible, citing various evolutionary psychology studies.
This document is a scanned page from 'JETGALA' magazine (page 53) featuring an article about Eric Roth and International Jet Interiors. The text discusses the technical and aesthetic challenges of refurbishing private aircraft, specifically noting a trend toward 'understated' luxury. While the text does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, the document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013274', indicating it was collected as part of the House Oversight Committee's investigation, likely regarding modifications made to Epstein's aircraft.
This document is a page from 'JetGala' magazine (page 51), stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013272). The text profiles 'Roth' (likely Eric Roth of International Jet Interiors), discussing high-end aircraft interior customizations. Specific examples include a 24-karat gold-plated sink for Donald Trump's Boeing 757, a 'sky studio' for a film producer's Gulfstream, and custom requests for clients in India. The page features images of luxury aircraft amenities including a Garmin controller, Hermès tableware, and custom upholstery.
This document is a digital communication log from the House Oversight Committee containing an exchange on August 25, 2018, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses an unnamed male figure ('He') whom they describe as 'drunk with power' and a 'moron,' while simultaneously dismissing 'lefrac' and 'Roth' as '3rd rate.' The exchange suggests the redacted individual is someone the subject 'fears.'
Roth discussed the matter with two senior staff colleagues and the Deputy Attorney General.
Alerted the OAG that Epstein's counsel might try to contact them for additional review and urged the OAG not to take their calls.
Expressed concern that Epstein's team would try to appeal to delay resolution.
Roth told OPR he was concerned Epstein's team would try to appeal further to delay the case.
Roth alerted the AG's office that Epstein's counsel might seek further review and urged them not to take the calls.
Roth alerted the AG's office that Epstein's counsel might seek additional review and urged them not to take the calls.
Roth informed Starr and Lefkowitz that a review was complete and intervention by the Deputy Attorney General was not warranted, and that federal prosecution was appropriate.
Roth informed Epstein's counsel that a review was complete and federal intervention was not warranted.
Informing them of a thorough review and belief that intervention by Deputy Attorney General was not warranted, and that federal prosecution is appropriate.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity