January 01, 2001
Period of conduct charged under Count Six
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appellant | person | 23 | View Entity |
| USAO-SDNY | organization | 132 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021086.jpg
This document is a page from an appellate legal brief (Case 22-1426) arguing that the District Court erred in applying the 'Annabi' legal precedent to the Appellant's case. The text argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) originated outside the Second Circuit and should not be subject to its specific legal canons, and further argues that the conduct charged in Count Six falls within the time period covered by the original NPA. The document specifically challenges the USAO-SDNY's charges relative to the 2001-2007 offense period.
Events with shared participants
Case 22-1426, Document 87, filed on 07/27/2023.
Date unknown
The court holds that the NPA between Epstein and USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY.
Date unknown
The District Court rejected the Appellant's attempt to enforce the NPA against the S2 Indictment, ruling that the NPA only bound the USAO-SDFL and not other U.S. Attorney's Offices.
Date unknown • District Court
Deadline to cure a deficient filing by resubmitting a text-searchable document.
2021-04-05
The court issued an Order granting the Appellant a word limit of 20,000 words.
2023-01-18
The USAO-SDNY commences the instant investigation.
2018-01-01 • Southern District of New York
Discussion of the potential prosecution of Maxwell by the USAO-SDNY and whether a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) precluded it.
Date unknown
Prosecution of Maxwell by the USAO-SDNY.
Date unknown
The USAO-SDNY opened its investigation into Epstein and his co-conspirators.
2018-01-01
Deadline to cure a defect in a filing and resubmit the document for Case 21-58.
2021-04-05
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event