Event Details
January 01, 2001
Description
Conduct charged under Count Six
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appellant | person | 23 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021844.jpg
This document is page 15 (labeled 20 of 51 in the header) of a legal appellate brief filed on November 1, 2024. It argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) covering the 2001-2007 period should have prevented the USAO-SDNY from charging the Appellant (contextually Ghislaine Maxwell) for conduct between 2001-2004. The text cites legal precedents (*Annabi*, *Alessi*, *Papa*) regarding whether plea agreements bind other US Attorney Offices and argues the Appellant was improperly denied an evidentiary hearing.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The District Court rejected the Appellant's attempt to enforce the NPA against the S2 Indictment, ruling that the NPA only bound the USAO-SDFL and not other U.S. Attorney's Offices.
Date unknown • District Court
Deadline to cure a deficient filing by resubmitting a text-searchable document.
2021-04-05
The court issued an Order granting the Appellant a word limit of 20,000 words.
2023-01-18
Deadline to cure a defect in a filing and resubmit the document for Case 21-58.
2021-04-05
Deadline to cure defect(s) and resubmit a document for Case 19-2221.
2019-08-07
The Appellant argues that all charges are barred by the five-year statute of limitations for noncapital offenses.
Date unknown • this Circuit
A notice of additional counsel was submitted on behalf of the appellant.
2019-08-05 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing because the submitted document was not text-searchable.
2019-08-05 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Period of conduct charged under Count Six
2001-01-01 • Not specified
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event