Event Details
March 29, 2009
Description
Testimony of Catherine Conrad in disciplinary committee hearing (PMD Exhibit 17).
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Conrad | person | 154 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009257.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the trial *United States v. Daugerdas* (Feb 15, 2012), likely filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) to challenge the credibility of a juror (Catherine Conrad). The transcript details the cross-examination of Conrad regarding her suspension from the practice of law, her history of alcoholism, and her failure to disclose these facts to the court (specifically Judge Pauley). Several exhibits (PMD 14, 17, and 20) confirming her disciplinary history and medical issues are admitted into evidence during the questioning.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Letter from Catherine Conrad to Stanley J. Oklua [sic], Esq.
2011-05-25
Certificate of Disposition for the case 'People v. Catherine Conrad'.
1998-08-21 • Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx
Examination of Ms. Edelstein by Mr. Okula regarding the firm's knowledge of facts related to a government note and a Catherine Conrad letter, and the ethical implications of a motion decision. The witness is excused at the end of the excerpt.
Date unknown • Southern District
Date mentioned in a question regarding when information was gathered on Catherine Conrad at Theresa Trzaskoma's request.
0012-05-01
Certificate of Disposition issued for the case 'People v. Catherine Conrad' from the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx.
1998-08-21 • Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx
A letter was sent from Catherine Conrad to Stanley J. Oklua, Esq.
2011-05-25
A pending disciplinary proceeding concerning Ms. Conrad's medical suspension held before the disciplinary committee of the First Judicial Department.
Date unknown • First Judicial Department
Planned testimony of Ms. Conrad where she intends to assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
2012-02-15 • courtroom
A jury had discussions and deliberations regarding David Parse, and struggled with the definitions of 'wilfully' and 'knowingly' for different counts, including conspiracy and tax evasion.
Date unknown
The Court read a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, during an afternoon session.
2011-05-11 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event