Event Details

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct testimony of a witness named McHugh. The testimony details a financial transaction occurring on June 18th involving an internal transfer of $7,400,000 from DDA account 6312 to DDA account 4324. The proceedings also introduce Government Exhibit 506, identified as a 'Morgan account signature card.'

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named 'Kate' by Ms. Sternheim. The questioning focuses on a past custody dispute, allegations of planting drugs (which are denied), and the witness's 'acquaintanceship' with a man connected to the Royal Family during the late 1990s, specifically mentioning an interaction at the Cannes Film Festival.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on establishing Jane's exact age (13 vs 14) when she first met Jeffrey Epstein, referencing prior statements made to the government and court filings.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between the Judge, Ms. Moe (Defense), and Ms. Menninger (Government) regarding the scope of cross-examination for a witness named 'Jane.' The discussion centers on whether the defense can ask if Jane is aware that her attorney told the government about her expectations for financial compensation in civil litigation, and whether such questions violate attorney-client privilege or are relevant to her credibility and bias.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness referred to as 'Jane.' Attorney Ms. Menninger questions Jane about a prior interview with the government, specifically regarding whether Jane remembered any specific abuse occurring during trips to New Mexico. The witness states she does not recall making the statements presented to her, and the prosecution (Ms. Moe) objects to the form of the questioning.

This document is a page from a court transcript involving the direct examination of a pilot named Rodgers. Rodgers testifies about a personal logbook he kept separate from official records, which tracked destinations, flight times, and passenger names for flights where he served as a crew member on Mr. Epstein's planes. The prosecution introduces 'Government Exhibit 662' for identification.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues against the admissibility of certain phone records/notes (specifically mentioning one labeled 'JE Natasha'), claiming they lack reliability, dates, and signatures, and do not meet the business record exception. Prosecutor Ms. Moe counters that the records are valid to show who called 'the house' and when, noting that witnesses have corroborated names found in these records.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Mrs. Hesse by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding message pads containing messages for Mr. Epstein. Hesse confirms she took messages at the residence when Epstein was absent and defends the accuracy of the messages she personally wrote, while acknowledging she cannot vouch for messages written by others.

This document is page 107 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a journal entry written on January 25, 1996. The questioning focuses on Farmer's conflicting descriptions of Jeffrey Epstein's behavior in a movie theater at that time, noting she described it simultaneously as 'weird,' 'normal,' and 'not a big deal.'

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by Ms. Comey. The testimony covers the identification of Carolyn's mother (Dorothy) and describes phone calls from Ghislaine Maxwell to schedule appointments, during which Maxwell would mention she and Jeffrey Epstein were 'flying in' from out of town.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a journal entry written by Farmer regarding a trip to New York, where she visited bars and saw bands. The attorney highlights her emotional state upon returning, noting she felt depressed to be home and that the trip changed her outlook on life, comparing this feeling to a previous trip to Mexico.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies that her sister, Maria, told her about a trip to New York where Jeffrey Epstein was interested in helping Annie with her education and was purchasing her travel ticket. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects on hearsay grounds, but the objection is overruled by the Court.