Date Unknown
Mr. Scarola made statements to the government about Carolyn.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR. SCAROLA | person | 157 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00008368.jpg
This legal document, part of a court case and addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that any potential attorney-client privilege regarding statements about a person named Carolyn was waived. The argument posits that because Mr. Scarola disclosed this information to the government, the confidentiality required for privilege was broken. The document cites multiple legal precedents to support the claim that this voluntary disclosure to a third party (the government) results in the forfeiture of the privilege, which is relevant for assessing Carolyn's credibility as she testifies against Ms. Maxwell.
Events with shared participants
Deposition of an unnamed witness
Date unknown • Not specified on this page
Deposition of an unnamed witness by Mr. Scarola.
Date unknown • Not specified
Deposition of an unidentified witness regarding a lawsuit referred to as 'Epstein versus RRA'. The witness is questioned about their associations with Alan Dershowitz and Tommy Mottola.
Date unknown • Not specified
A deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by Mr. Scarola, with Mr. Pike present as counsel. The witness invokes their constitutional rights to avoid answering questions.
Date unknown • Not specified
Deposition/Testimony of Professor Cassell
Date unknown • Unknown
Deposition Interruption
Date unknown • Deposition Room
Deposition of Professor Cassell regarding knowledge of allegations against Alan Dershowitz.
Date unknown • Unknown
Disruption during deposition
Date unknown • Deposition Room
Deposition of Mr. Rothstein
Date unknown • Unknown
End of deposition session / Break
Date unknown • Unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event