Date Unknown
Ghislaine Maxwell's testimony regarding not witnessing the President in any massage setting or inappropriate setting, and describing him as a gentleman.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The President | person | 93 | View Entity |
| TODD BLANCHE | person | 383 | View Entity |
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | person | 9575 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00022499.tif
This document is an excerpt from a transcript of testimony or an interview, likely involving Ghislaine Maxwell and an interviewer named Todd Blanche. Maxwell discusses photographs and social settings involving Epstein and 'The President', stating that she never witnessed 'The President' in any inappropriate settings or acting inappropriately, and described him as a gentleman. The document also bears a DOJ-OGR number and is from Magna Legal Services.
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated the President's interpretation.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: United States v. Lovett. The President enforced a statute to withhold compensation from employees, despite believing it was unconstitutional, while the Justice Department argued against its constitutionality.
1946-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute, which the President viewed as unconstitutional, while the Justice Department attacked its constitutionality in court.
1988-01-01 • United States
The Ninth Circuit court ruled in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman (842 F.2d 1102), rejecting the President's constitutional arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.
1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit
The President refused to comply with provisions of the Competition in Contracting Act, viewing them as unconstitutional.
Date unknown
The Ninth Circuit issues its initial ruling in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman, 842 F.2d 1102, rejecting the President's constitutionality arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.
1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell
2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals
A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.
Date unknown
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
The memorandum was declassified by order of the President.
2018-02-02 • United States
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event