Event Details

January 01, 1926

Description

Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated the President's interpretation.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
Senator Pepper person 4 View Entity
U.S. Supreme Court organization 403 View Entity
The President person 93 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012393.jpg

Legal analysis document / Memorandum • 3.31 MB
View

This document is a legal analysis discussing the U.S. President's executive power in relation to enforcing laws believed to be unconstitutional. It summarizes a 1985 Congressional Research Service memorandum and five Supreme Court cases (from 1926-1991) that illustrate historical conflicts between the executive and legislative branches. Despite the user's query identifying it as 'Epstein-related', the text of this specific page contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related matters.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Supreme Court case: Freytag v. Commissioner. A unanimous Court ruled on the appointment of special trial judges by the U.S. Tax Court under the Appointments Clause.

1991-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case: United States v. Lovett. The President enforced a statute to withhold compensation from employees, despite believing it was unconstitutional, while the Justice Department argued against its constitutionality.

1946-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute, which the President viewed as unconstitutional, while the Justice Department attacked its constitutionality in court.

1988-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case *Myers v. United States*, where the Court vindicated the President's refusal to enforce a law he believed was unconstitutional.

1926-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case *Freytag v. Commissioner*, where the Court ruled on the appointment of special trial judges by the U.S. Tax Court, leading to a concurrence by Justice Scalia on Presidential power.

1991-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the President refused to enforce a law limiting his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated his interpretation.

1926-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case Freytag v. Commissioner, which ruled on the appointment of special trial judges and included a concurrence from Justice Scalia on presidential power.

1991-01-01 • United States

View

The Ninth Circuit court ruled in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman (842 F.2d 1102), rejecting the President's constitutional arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.

1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit

View

The President refused to comply with provisions of the Competition in Contracting Act, viewing them as unconstitutional.

Date unknown

View

The Ninth Circuit issues its initial ruling in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman, 842 F.2d 1102, rejecting the President's constitutionality arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.

1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
United States
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-17 03:29

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012393.jpg
Date String
1926

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event