Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
The defendant was held in pretrial confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| unnamed defendant | person | 51 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010581.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a government filing arguing against a defendant's request for a lenient sentence. The prosecution refutes the defendant's claims of harsh pretrial confinement conditions, stating the Court was well-informed and the conditions did not warrant a downward variance. The filing also dismisses the defendant's comparison to the Harvey Weinstein case, asserting that her federal child exploitation crimes are different and warrant a significant sentence, citing a similar case (United States v. Maria Soly Almonte) as precedent.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense submitted a financial report showing the defendant has approximately $22 million in assets.
Date unknown • Court
An officer observed a vehicle improperly parked, conducted a traffic stop, detected the odor of marijuana, questioned the five occupants, and arrested the defendant after she admitted to possessing marijuana and paraphernalia.
2005-09-11 • 200 block of Bahama Lane
In a cited S.D.N.Y. case, a defendant with private security guards was outside his apartment virtually all day, was visited by a masseuse for 160 hours in 30 days, and went on an unauthorized visit to a restaurant in Chinatown.
Date unknown • Chinatown
Officer Nicholas Christo observed a white Mitsubishi parked in a safety zone. After the vehicle moved, he conducted a traffic stop. Upon approaching the vehicle, he detected the odor of marijuana, questioned the five occupants, and the defendant admitted to possessing marijuana and paraphernalia, which she handed over. The defendant was then arrested for possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia.
2005-09-11 • 200 Block of Bahama Lane
The Defendant filed her third motion for bail.
Date unknown • Court
A judge is delivering a ruling or explanation regarding the application of sentencing guidelines 4B1.5(b) and 3B1.1(a) to a defendant, rejecting the defendant's objections to sentencing enhancements.
2023-02-28 • Southern District Court (implied)
The defendant received her copy of the Government's first discovery production.
2020-08-11
The original hearing where the defendant's detention was decided.
Date unknown • United States
A judge overrules a defendant's objection to a sentencing enhancement for undue influence in a commercial sex act involving a minor.
2023-06-29 • Court (implied)
The defendant stopped appearing in public and went into hiding in New England.
2019-01-01 • New England
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event