January 01, 2015
Wild's CVRA case declaration regarding lack of notification about plea.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild | person | 46 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00023273.tif
This document details events surrounding Epstein's state plea, focusing on victim notification failures and the actions of various legal and investigative parties. It highlights Villafaña's efforts to identify victims and contact their attorneys, and statements from victims (Wild, Jane Doe #2) expressing their lack of awareness regarding the plea's implications for their cases. The document also notes discrepancies in the State Attorney's Office's communication about the case closure and Epstein's sentence.
Events with shared participants
A judge permitted victim Wild to receive access to the NPA pursuant to a protective order.
2008-01-01
The FBI interviewed victim Wild but did not inform her that a potential outcome of the case was a state plea.
2007-01-01
The FBI told Wild and two other victims that the case had been resolved.
2007-01-01
Wild received a letter from the FBI stating the case was under investigation, contradicting the October 2007 information.
2008-01-10
Villafaña and the FBI interviewed three victims, including Wild. The emotional toll on the victims was significant, and Wild expressed her willingness to testify.
2008-01-31
Wild appealed the district court's rejection of remedies by filing a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus.
2019-09-30 • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Wild received a letter from Villafaña inaccurately stating she was a federal victim entitled to CVRA rights.
2007-01-01
The FBI interviewed Wild but did not tell her a potential outcome was a state plea.
2007-01-01
The FBI sent Wild a victims' rights letter indicating the case was under investigation.
2008-01-10
Villafaña re-interviewed Wild, telling her the case was under investigation but not specifically mentioning the NPA.
2008-01-31
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event