Event Details

January 01, 1988

Description

The case of Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988) was decided, in which a lawyer was disciplined for not reporting a belief that an opposing witness lied in a deposition.

Participants (5)

Name Type Mentions
district judge person 12 View Entity
lawyer person 10 View Entity
Federal Grievance Committee organization 4 View Entity
opposing witness person 0 View Entity
Doe person 125 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00010128.jpg

Legal document • 906 KB
View

This document is page 3 of a legal filing from April 6, 2012, in case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP. It discusses a lawyer's ethical obligations under various New York Rules of Professional Conduct, specifically concerning the duty to act upon knowledge of false evidence, fraudulent conduct, or improper conduct toward a jury. The document emphasizes that the standard for a lawyer's required knowledge is "actual knowledge" and cites the 1988 Second Circuit case, *Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee*, to illustrate this legal principle.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Alleged sexual encounter or inappropriate contact

Date unknown • Little Saint James Island

View

Sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3

Date unknown • Unknown

View

The Second Circuit case, Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988), addressed the knowledge requirement for a lawyer to report a belief that an opposing witness had lied.

1988-01-01 • Connecticut

View

The Doe v. Indyke case was initiated after the Government opened its investigation and after the Indictment in the criminal case was filed.

Date unknown

View

The civil case Doe v. Indyke, where discovery was just beginning and the Government moved to intervene and stay proceedings.

Date unknown

View

Connecticut disciplinary hearing for 'Doe'

Date unknown • Connecticut

View

The district judge denied the petitioners' motion for remedies and closed the CVRA case following Epstein's death.

2019-09-16

View

The initial stage of the case, opening statements, is scheduled to begin after lunch.

Date unknown • courtroom

View

Filing of Jane Doe No. 3 public affidavit in the CVRA case.

2015-01-21 • Court (CVRA case)

View

The 'Doe case' was stayed to avoid adversely affecting an ongoing criminal prosecution against Maxwell.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Legal Case
Location
Connecticut
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
5
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:54

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00010128.jpg
Date String
1988

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event