Event Details
January 01, 1988
Description
The Second Circuit case, Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988), addressed the knowledge requirement for a lawyer to report a belief that an opposing witness had lied.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Developers/Lawyers | person | 0 | View Entity |
| district judge | person | 12 | View Entity |
| Federal Grievance Committee | organization | 4 | View Entity |
| Doe | person | 125 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009449.jpg
This legal document, page 3 of 29 from a court filing, discusses a lawyer's ethical obligations under various New York Rules of Professional Conduct. It emphasizes that a lawyer's duty to take remedial action, such as disclosing fraudulent conduct to a court, is triggered only by "actual knowledge," a subjective standard. The document cites the 1988 Second Circuit case 'Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee' to support the argument that a mere belief of wrongdoing is insufficient to compel disclosure.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Alleged sexual encounter or inappropriate contact
Date unknown • Little Saint James Island
Sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3
Date unknown • Unknown
The Doe v. Indyke case was initiated after the Government opened its investigation and after the Indictment in the criminal case was filed.
Date unknown
The civil case Doe v. Indyke, where discovery was just beginning and the Government moved to intervene and stay proceedings.
Date unknown
Connecticut disciplinary hearing for 'Doe'
Date unknown • Connecticut
The district judge denied the petitioners' motion for remedies and closed the CVRA case following Epstein's death.
2019-09-16
The case of Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988) was decided, in which a lawyer was disciplined for not reporting a belief that an opposing witness lied in a deposition.
1988-01-01 • Connecticut
Filing of Jane Doe No. 3 public affidavit in the CVRA case.
2015-01-21 • Court (CVRA case)
The 'Doe case' was stayed to avoid adversely affecting an ongoing criminal prosecution against Maxwell.
Date unknown
Alleged dinner party (disputed by Dershowitz)
Date unknown • Epstein's private island
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event