Event Details

February 15, 2012

Description

Court testimony of witness Conrad in US v. Daugerdas.

Participants (6)

Name Type Mentions
Mr. Gair person 86 View Entity
Conrad person 113 View Entity
Catherine Conrad person 154 View Entity
MR. OKULA person 182 View Entity
Unidentified Counsel (Q) person 2 View Entity
The Court organization 2003 View Entity

Source Documents (3)

DOJ-OGR-00009244.jpg

Court Transcript • 1.02 MB
View

This document is a court transcript from the trial 'United States v. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012, which was filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The transcript features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad, focusing on her mental state (medication use), her refusal to accept a subpoena during a December 20th hearing before Judge Pauley, and her financial inability to hire counsel. The questioning attorney challenges Conrad on whether her behavior of rejecting a subpoena and inviting arrest was 'rational' conduct for an officer of the court.

DOJ-OGR-00009260.jpg

Court Transcript / Legal Exhibit • 992 KB
View

This document is a transcript from the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' (2012), filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It features the testimony of a witness named Conrad, who admits to lying during jury selection (voir dire) before Judge Pauley to avoid being dismissed. Specifically, she failed to disclose a 2007 arrest in Winslow, Arizona, for disorderly conduct following a domestic dispute with her husband, and subsequently skipped her court date.

DOJ-OGR-00009257.jpg

Court Transcript (Trial Testimony) • 1 MB
View

This document is a transcript page from the trial *United States v. Daugerdas* (Feb 15, 2012), likely filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) to challenge the credibility of a juror (Catherine Conrad). The transcript details the cross-examination of Conrad regarding her suspension from the practice of law, her history of alcoholism, and her failure to disclose these facts to the court (specifically Judge Pauley). Several exhibits (PMD 14, 17, and 20) confirming her disciplinary history and medical issues are admitted into evidence during the questioning.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.

2022-08-10

View

A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.

2022-08-10 • courthouse

View

The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.

Date unknown

View

The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.

2020-07-14

View

A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Jury Deliberation/Instruction

Date unknown • Courtroom

View

Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom

View

Initial bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, which was held 12 days after her arrest.

Date unknown

View

An initial bail hearing was held where the Court expressed concerns about COVID-19 and found the Defendant had no underlying health conditions.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Courtroom
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
6
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-11-20 21:53

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009260.jpg
Date String
February 15, 2012

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event