March 07, 2019
United States v. Boustani decision affirmed
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boustani | person | 59 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00002192(1).jpg
This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text presents a legal argument supporting the detention of the defendant by distinguishing her case from previous instances where bail was granted (Khashoggi, Bodmer) and comparing her to cases where detention was upheld due to flight risk and foreign ties (Boustani, Patrick Ho). Notably, it cites a 2001 case, 'United States v. Epstein,' as precedent for denying bail based on dual citizenship and lack of extradition treaties; however, this 2001 citation likely refers to a different defendant named Epstein (in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) rather than Jeffrey Epstein.
Events with shared participants
In United States v. Boustani, the defendant was ordered detained pending trial due to risk of flight.
2019-03-07 • E.D.N.Y.
Citation for United States v. Boustani, 932 F.3d 79.
2019-01-01 • 2d Cir.
United States v. Boustani, where the defendant was ordered detained pending trial due to risk of flight based on several factors including access to financial resources and ties to foreign countries.
2019-03-07 • E.D.N.Y.
Decision in the case of United States v. Boustani.
2019-01-01 • 2d Cir.
United States v. Boustani, 356 F. Supp. 3d 246 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d, No. 19-344, 2019 WL 2070656 (2d Cir. Mar. 7, 2019)
2019-03-07 • Eastern District of New York
Ruling in the case of United States v. Boustani.
2019-01-01 • E.D.N.Y.
United States v. Boustani ruling affirmed
2019-03-07 • 2d Cir.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals issues opinion in United States v. Boustani
2019-08-01 • New York
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event