Event Details
March 07, 2019
Description
United States v. Boustani ruling affirmed
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boustani | person | 59 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00002192.jpg
This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues against the defendant's release by distinguishing her case from precedents where bail was granted (Khashoggi, Bodmer) and aligning it with cases where detention was upheld due to flight risk and foreign ties (Boustani, Patrick Ho, and a 2001 case United States v. Epstein). The 'United States v. Epstein' cited here refers to a 2001 case from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania involving a defendant with German/Brazilian dual citizenship, used here as legal precedent for denying bail based on lack of extradition treaties.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
In United States v. Boustani, the defendant was ordered detained pending trial due to risk of flight.
2019-03-07 • E.D.N.Y.
Citation for United States v. Boustani, 932 F.3d 79.
2019-01-01 • 2d Cir.
United States v. Boustani, where the defendant was ordered detained pending trial due to risk of flight based on several factors including access to financial resources and ties to foreign countries.
2019-03-07 • E.D.N.Y.
Decision in the case of United States v. Boustani.
2019-01-01 • 2d Cir.
United States v. Boustani, 356 F. Supp. 3d 246 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d, No. 19-344, 2019 WL 2070656 (2d Cir. Mar. 7, 2019)
2019-03-07 • Eastern District of New York
Ruling in the case of United States v. Boustani.
2019-01-01 • E.D.N.Y.
United States v. Boustani decision affirmed
2019-03-07 • 2d Cir.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals issues opinion in United States v. Boustani
2019-08-01 • New York
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event