Event Details
June 25, 2022
Description
Filing of Document 675 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Participants (5)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELIZABETH | person | 25 | View Entity |
| Legal Counsel | person | 2 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | person | 9575 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
DOJ-OGR-00010702.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal filing (Document 675) from June 25, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that the Court should hear from all victims of Maxwell's sex trafficking conspiracy during sentencing, citing legal precedents (such as United States v. Salutric) that allow judges to consider a defendant's broader criminal history and uncharged acts. The text emphasizes that victim impact statements regarding background and conduct are essential for determining a fair sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00010701.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing from June 25, 2022, related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the court has broad discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to hear from individuals during sentencing, even if they do not strictly meet the definition of a 'victim' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It cites various legal precedents to support the admission of statements from 'affected individuals,' specifically mentioning 'Sarah' at the very end of the page.
DOJ-OGR-00010694.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) argues for the right of victims named Sarah and Elizabeth to read their Victim Impact Statements at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. It details the severe psychological and physical trauma suffered by both victims, including suicide attempts and hospitalizations, resulting from the 'Epstein/Maxwell trap.' The document cites the Crime Victim’s Rights Act (CVRA) and relevant case law to support the victims' right to be heard.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell
2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals
A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.
Date unknown
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail
2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event