Date Unknown
A trial concerning alleged sex crimes against underage girls, involving sexually suggestive or explicit evidence.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| juror | person | 81 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00005299.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It aims to identify potential biases by asking jurors about their ability to remain impartial in a case involving sex crimes against minors. The questions specifically address the sexually explicit nature of the evidence, views on age of consent laws, and opinions on the enforcement of federal sex trafficking laws.
Events with shared participants
Court Recess due to Juror Illness
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
A post-verdict hearing was held where a trial court found a juror demonstrated bias.
Date unknown
A court official outlines the daily schedule and procedure for the jury selection process (voir dire).
2021-12-08 • public courtroom
Discussion of the legal doctrine of 'inferred bias' in the context of jury selection and dismissal for cause.
Date unknown
A hearing where a juror gave answers about childhood abuse.
Date unknown
A juror in the Sampson case had been threatened by her husband with a gun, which she did not disclose during a gunpoint bank robbery case.
Date unknown
A juror in the Ashfar case was sexually assaulted by a babysitter when he was five or six years old, which he did not disclose during a child sexual assault case.
Date unknown
In the cited case of Torres, the district court struck a juror for cause because she had engaged in the structuring of cash deposits.
Date unknown
The document is a questionnaire for potential jurors for an upcoming trial involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The questions pertain to the juror's ability to remain impartial during the trial.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event