Event Details
April 20, 2020
Description
A ruling was made in a case involving Gonzalez, denying temporary release.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez | person | 60 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00001628.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 13, 2020, argues against a defendant's motion for temporary release. It cites two prior rulings from the Southern District of New York (involving Gonzalez and Eley) to establish that release is not necessary, especially when trials are not imminent. The document further contends that the detention center (MDC) has been responsive and accommodating to defense counsel's requests for client access, undermining the argument that release is required for defense preparation.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
United States v. Gonzalez, No. 00 Cr. 447, 2000 WL 1721171
2000-01-01
A court in S.D.N.Y. ruled that Gonzalez failed to demonstrate the necessity of temporary release.
2020-04-20 • S.D.N.Y.
United States v. Gonzalez, 93 F. App'x 268 (2d Cir. 2004)
2004-01-01 • 2d Cir.
Court decision in United States v. Gonzalez, where time served during the pandemic was described as harsh and punitive.
2021-04-16
Visits to Epstein's home for massage
Date unknown • Epstein's residence
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event