April 20, 2020
A court in S.D.N.Y. ruled that Gonzalez failed to demonstrate the necessity of temporary release.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez | person | 60 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00001002.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 15, 2020, argues against a defendant's request for temporary release by citing two recent S.D.N.Y. precedents (involving Gonzalez and Eley) where release was denied due to trials not being imminent. The filing also asserts that the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) has been responsive and accommodating to defense counsel's requests for client access, undermining the claim that release is necessary for trial preparation.
Events with shared participants
United States v. Gonzalez, No. 00 Cr. 447, 2000 WL 1721171
2000-01-01
United States v. Gonzalez, 93 F. App'x 268 (2d Cir. 2004)
2004-01-01 • 2d Cir.
A ruling was made in a case involving Gonzalez, denying temporary release.
2020-04-20 • S.D.N.Y.
Court decision in United States v. Gonzalez, where time served during the pandemic was described as harsh and punitive.
2021-04-16
Visits to Epstein's home for massage
Date unknown • Epstein's residence
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event