Event Details
January 01, 1999
Description
Decision in State v. Timmendequas (737 A.2d 55).
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey Supreme Court | organization | 13 | View Entity |
| Timmendequas | person | 6 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742.jpg
Legal Document / Law Review Article Printout
• 2.41 MB
This document appears to be a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 28 of a 52-page production) included in a file by attorney David Schoen for the House Oversight Committee. The text outlines legal arguments regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), quoting Senator Kyl and citing case law (State v. Timmendequas) to argue that victims have a due process right to be heard, particularly regarding venue transfer decisions, to minimize their inconvenience and trauma.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
State v. Timmendequas decision
1999-01-01 • New Jersey
Event Metadata
Type
Unknown
Location
New Jersey
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-21 00:15
Additional Data
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742.jpg
Date String
1999
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event