Event Details
January 01, 1999
Description
State v. Timmendequas decision
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey Supreme Court | organization | 13 | View Entity |
| Timmendequas | person | 6 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017681.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 46 of 78 in the exhibit) submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017681). The text analyzes the legal rights of crime victims to attend trials and have input on venue transfers, citing Supreme Court precedents and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It specifically discusses the New Jersey case *State v. Timmendequas* as an example of prioritizing victims' convenience by importing a jury rather than moving the trial location.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Decision in State v. Timmendequas (737 A.2d 55).
1999-01-01 • New Jersey
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event