Event Details
January 01, 1988
Description
The Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Taylor v. Illinois, which involved the exclusion of a witness as a sanction for a discovery violation.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court | location | 22 | View Entity |
| Taylor | person | 57 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00005602.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that precluding certain statements is the only appropriate remedy for a discovery violation. It cites Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(2)(C) and legal precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in *Taylor v. Illinois*, to establish that a court has the discretion to impose such a sanction. The argument rests on balancing a defendant's rights against public interests like the integrity of the trial process and the fair administration of justice.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case Blackledge v. Perry, addressing prosecutorial vindictiveness.
1974-01-01 • U.S.
Supreme Court case Williams v. Pennsylvania, addressing judicial bias.
2016-01-01 • Pennsylvania
The Supreme Court rejects Section 3 of DOMA in the case United States v. Windsor.
0013-08-28 • United States
Supreme Court holds that muni bonds are still tax-free in Kentucky v. Davis.
0008-05-30
Supreme Court affirms that trust investment advisory fees are subject to a 2% floor (Knight case).
0008-01-28
Issuance of a Supreme Court opinion (likely NYT v Sullivan) regarding the Sedition Act.
1964-01-01 • Supreme Court
The case of *Taylor v. United States*, 495 U.S. 575, 602 (1990) is cited as an example of courts employing the 'categorical approach'.
1990-01-01
Supreme Court's Windsor decision regarding DOMA
2013-06-01 • Washington D.C.
Supreme Court decision in Flemming v. Nestor
1960-01-01 • USA
Roe v. Wade
Date unknown • US Supreme Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event