Event Details

February 15, 2012

Description

Court proceeding or deposition for United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
Pauley person 4 View Entity
Parse person 55 View Entity
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS person 222 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00009972.jpg

Court Transcript Word Index / Concordance • 1.08 MB
View

This document is a word index (concordance) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' It tracks the frequency and location (page:line) of words alphabetically from 'otherwise' to 'petit'. Although the content concerns the Daugerdas tax fraud case, the header 'Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN' indicates this document was filed on February 14, 2022, as Exhibit A-5689 in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

2014-02-24 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

View

A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.

2012-02-15 • SOUTHERN DISTRICT

View

A trial where Ms. Conrad and eleven other jurors rendered a verdict against Paul M. Daugerdas.

2012-02-15 • Federal Court

View

Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.

Date unknown • Southern District

View

Court proceeding for the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., as indicated by the date on the transcript index.

2012-02-15 • Southern District

View

A wide-ranging corrupt endeavor to obstruct and impede the IRS and defraud the IRS through the design, marketing, implementation, and defense of four tax shelters known as Short Sale, Short Option, SWAPS, and HOMER, as well as the Jenkens & Gilchrist tax shelters.

Date unknown

View

A trial that demonstrated Parse's role as a key actor in the largest criminal tax fraud in history.

Date unknown

View

Ms. Brune, her firm, or defendant Parse acknowledged being differently situated than other defendants during a telephone call on July 22nd.

Date unknown

View

Defendant Parse waived his new trial motion in a district court proceeding.

Date unknown • district court

View

The 2d Circuit court reversed the district court's conclusion that defendant Parse had waived his new trial motion.

2015-01-01 • 2d Cir.

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Southern District (New York)
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 18:25

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009972.jpg
Date String
February 15, 2012

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event