February 15, 2012
Court proceeding or deposition for United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pauley | person | 4 | View Entity |
| Parse | person | 55 | View Entity |
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | person | 222 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009972.jpg
This document is a word index (concordance) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' It tracks the frequency and location (page:line) of words alphabetically from 'otherwise' to 'petit'. Although the content concerns the Daugerdas tax fraud case, the header 'Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN' indicates this document was filed on February 14, 2022, as Exhibit A-5689 in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
Events with shared participants
Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
2014-02-24 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
2012-02-15 • SOUTHERN DISTRICT
A trial where Ms. Conrad and eleven other jurors rendered a verdict against Paul M. Daugerdas.
2012-02-15 • Federal Court
Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
Date unknown • Southern District
Court proceeding for the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., as indicated by the date on the transcript index.
2012-02-15 • Southern District
A wide-ranging corrupt endeavor to obstruct and impede the IRS and defraud the IRS through the design, marketing, implementation, and defense of four tax shelters known as Short Sale, Short Option, SWAPS, and HOMER, as well as the Jenkens & Gilchrist tax shelters.
Date unknown
A trial that demonstrated Parse's role as a key actor in the largest criminal tax fraud in history.
Date unknown
Ms. Brune, her firm, or defendant Parse acknowledged being differently situated than other defendants during a telephone call on July 22nd.
Date unknown
Defendant Parse waived his new trial motion in a district court proceeding.
Date unknown • district court
The 2d Circuit court reversed the district court's conclusion that defendant Parse had waived his new trial motion.
2015-01-01 • 2d Cir.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event