Extraction Summary

7
People
4
Organizations
5
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing (motion for extension of time)
File Size: 131 KB
Summary

This is an unopposed motion filed on October 29, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Epstein requests an extension until November 16, 2009, to respond to a complaint filed by 'Jane Doe No. 102' on May 1, 2009, citing that the parties are working together to potentially resolve the case. The document lists legal counsel for both sides, including Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger for Epstein, and Robert Josefsberg and Katherine Ezell for the plaintiff.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Seeking extension of time to respond to complaint.
Jane Doe No. 102 Plaintiff
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-80656.
Robert D. Critton Jr. Attorney
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
Michael J. Pike Attorney
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
Jack Alan Goldberger Attorney
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
Robert C. Josefsberg Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff.
Katherine W. Ezell Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of Florida
Court where the case is filed.
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
Law firm representing Epstein.
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
Law firm representing Epstein.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
Law firm representing the Plaintiff.

Timeline (2 events)

2009-05-01
Plaintiff filed Complaint [DE 1].
Southern District of Florida
2009-11-16
Proposed new deadline for Defendant to file response.
Southern District of Florida

Locations (5)

Location Context
Location of defense counsel offices.
Location of plaintiff counsel offices.
Address for Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman.
Address for Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
Address for Podhurst Orseck, P.A.

Relationships (3)

Jeffrey Epstein Attorney-Client Robert D. Critton Jr.
Signed motion as Attorney for Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein Attorney-Client Jack Alan Goldberger
Listed as Counsel for Defendant
Jane Doe No. 102 Attorney-Client Robert C. Josefsberg
Listed as Counsel for Plaintiff

Key Quotes (2)

"The parties continue to work together to potentially resolve this case."
Source
053.pdf
Quote #1
"The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN to fully and adequately respond."
Source
053.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,115 characters)

Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/29/2009 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 09-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE No. 102,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant,
___________________________/
DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME IN WHICH SERVE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter “Epstein”), by and through his undersigned
attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to respond to
Complaint dated, May 1, 2009 [DE 1]. Defendant seeks an extension until November
16, 2009, to file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion,
Defendant states:
1. On May 1, 2009 Plaintiff filed a Complaint [DE 1]. Defendant’s response would
be due on August 20, 2009, as previously agreed upon.
2. The parties continue to work together to potentially resolve this case.
3. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstances as it will
provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN to fully and adequately respond.
4. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff’s counsel is in agreement with the requested extension.
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/29/2009 Page 2 of 3
Doe 102 v. Epstein
Page 2
WHEREFORE Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order
granting an extension until November 16, 2009, to file a response to Plaintiff’s
Complaint.
Local Rule 7.1 Statement
Counsel for the movant conferred by telephone and correspondence with
counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested
extension until November 16, 2009 for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
[Signature]
Robert D. Critton Jr., Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Certificate of Service
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with
the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being
served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the
manner specified by CM/ECF on this 29th day of October, 2009
Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130
305 358-2800
Fax: 305 358-2382
rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
kezell@podhurst.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
Fax: 561-835-8691
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/29/2009 Page 3 of 3
Doe 102 v. Epstein
Page 3
Respectfully submitted,
By: [Signature]
ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 224162
rcrit@bclclaw.com
MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
Florida Bar #617296
mpike@bclclaw.com
BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561/842-2820 Phone
561/515-3148 Fax
(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document