Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
A legal argument concerning jury instructions for the terms 'persuasion,' 'inducement,' 'enticement,' and 'coercion' and the required level of causation. The relevance of the 'Broxmeyer' case was debated.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| your Honor | person | 807 | View Entity |
| Unnamed speaker | person | 72 | View Entity |
| Mr. Everdell | person | 1327 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00016951.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about jury instructions. An unnamed speaker contends that a specific instruction on causation for terms like 'persuasion' and 'inducement' would confuse the jury and is not required by precedent from the Broxmeyer case. In response, Mr. Everdell argues that such an instruction would not heighten the level of proof but would simply clarify the meaning of the words as they are used in the statute.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Cross-examination of witness Visoski by Mr. Everdell regarding flights and the identity of a passenger named Jane.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
The Court called a 10-minute break in the proceedings.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
Attorneys and the judge discuss the procedure for presenting evidence to the jury.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
An attorney makes a statement to the judge regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion about a witness coming from the U.K. who cannot be present until Monday.
Date unknown
A discussion in court between the judge and Mr. Everdell regarding the admissibility of testimony and evidence related to property records.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event