Event Details

This document is page 830 from 349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series. It outlines legal standards for intentional infliction of emotional distress, trespass, and negligence in the context of lawsuits related to the September 11, 2001 attacks (specifically the Ashton and Burnett plaintiffs). It significantly addresses banking liability, citing case law to establish that banks generally do not owe a duty to non-customers to protect them from the intentional torts of their customers, nor are they liable for injuries caused by money passing through routine banking services. While the document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page; however, the legal precedents regarding banking liability are relevant to investigations into financial institutions that serviced high-risk clients.

This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing or opinion retrieved via Westlaw, related to the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It lists various US statutes (U.S.C.), state laws (PA, NY), and international resolutions (UN Security Council) cited in the case, along with their corresponding page numbers. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, possibly related to investigations into financial institutions.

This document is page 35 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) related to 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001', bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It details allegations against Saudi financial institutions, including Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and DMI Trust, regarding their financing of Al Qaeda, Hamas, and other terrorist groups through complex networks of charities and investments. The text specifically highlights a $50 million capital injection by Osama bin Laden into Al Shamal Bank and names various Saudi royals and businessmen as knowingly supporting terrorism. While labeled as Epstein-related in the prompt, the text itself focuses exclusively on 9/11 litigation and terror financing.

This document is a page from a legal filing or court opinion related to the litigation 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001' (2012). It details corporate ownership structures and disclosure statements for various entities including BGC Partners, Cantor Fitzgerald, and several insurance companies (CNA, Chubb, One Beacon), identifying parent corporations and ownership percentages. It also notes the dissolution dates for specific financial entities in 2008 and 2010. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.