Event Details
Unknown
Description
Deposition of a witness
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR. TEIN | person | 444 | View Entity |
| court reporter | person | 24 | View Entity |
| Mr. Leopold | person | 126 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00033000.jpg
This document is page 12 of a deposition transcript involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they are aware that a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filed a lawsuit on their behalf. Mr. Leopold objects based on attorney-client privilege, specifically referencing conversations between himself and the witness, as well as an 'attorney from Miami'.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace message (Exhibit 31-001). A recess was taken during the proceedings.
Date unknown • Unspecified deposition location
A legal deposition is taking place where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with their attorney Mr. Leopold present.
Date unknown • Not specified
A discussion was held 'off the record' during the deposition.
Date unknown • Undetermined
A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where a direct examination of a witness occurred. The filename '~0929104.TXT' suggests the date.
2004-09-29 • Likely Coconut Grove, FL
Direct examination of a witness by Mr. Tein, indexed to begin on page 4 of the full transcript.
Date unknown
The witness is questioned by Mr. Tein in a legal proceeding.
Date unknown • Not specified (likely a deposition room)
A legal deposition where an unidentified witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein.
2010-09-29 • Unknown
The deposition or testimony recorded in this transcript took place.
2010-09-29 • undetermined
A legal deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with Mr. Leopold also present as an attorney.
2010-09-29 • Undisclosed deposition location
A heated argument occurs during a legal deposition among the attorneys present. The dispute centers on procedural conduct, interruptions, and the nature of objections, specifically attorney-client privilege.
Date unknown • Deposition Room (unspecified)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event