This document is page 12 of a deposition transcript involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they are aware that a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filed a lawsuit on their behalf. Mr. Leopold objects based on attorney-client privilege, specifically referencing conversations between himself and the witness, as well as an 'attorney from Miami'.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Tein | Attorney |
Questioning attorney conducting the deposition.
|
| Mr. Leopold | Attorney |
Defending attorney raising objections and instructing the witness on privilege.
|
| Jeffrey Herman | Lawyer |
Mentioned as a lawyer who allegedly filed a lawsuit on the witness's behalf.
|
| [Redacted] | Witness |
The deponent whose name is redacted in lines 9 and 25.
|
| The Court Reporter | Court Reporter |
Confirming the deposition is being recorded.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Consor & Associates Reporting and Transcription, Inc. |
Reporting firm listed in the header.
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (indicated by Bates stamp).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the reporting firm listed in the footer.
|
|
|
Location of an attorney mentioned by Mr. Leopold.
|
"are you aware that a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filed a lawsuit on your behalf, yes or no?"Source
"It's attorney/client privilege, as well as any conversations you may have had with the attorney from Miami."Source
"You're actually wrong about the attorney/client privilege."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,202 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document