Event Details

This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), detailing specific rights afforded to victims, such as the right to be heard and the right to restitution, and argues that the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure must be amended to reflect these statutory rights. The text cites Senators Kyl and Feinstein and references the Oklahoma City bombing case as a catalyst for the legislation.

This document is an excerpt from a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on closed-circuit transmission of trials for victims and the right to be heard at sentencing for petty offenses. The text argues that the CVRA necessitates changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to ensure victim participation. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely used as an exhibit or reference in legal proceedings or congressional inquiries related to the Epstein case (likely regarding CVRA violations).

This document is page 4 of 52 from a production to the House Oversight Committee, stamped with the name David Schoen. The content is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the history of the victims' rights movement, specifically the 1982 President's Task Force on Victims of Crime and subsequent state constitutional amendments (highlighting Arizona). The text analyzes the legal shift towards protecting victims' rights to be present and heard during criminal proceedings.

This document is page 37 of 52 from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues for victims' rights to access presentence reports and be heard at sentencing, countering arguments made by the 'Practitioners' Group' (defense attorneys). The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen at the bottom and a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production related to a congressional investigation.

This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 11 of 52) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the necessity of amending Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 11) to ensure victims' rights are not ignored during plea hearings. It cites the Oklahoma City bombing case as an example where victims were excluded due to rigid adherence to evidence rules. The document bears the footer 'DAVID SCHOEN' and a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was likely part of the materials reviewed during the congressional oversight of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding the non-prosecution agreement and the failure to notify victims.