Event Details
Historical (Unknown specific date)
Description
Oral argument for 'I Am Curious Yellow' case
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court Justices | person | 0 | View Entity |
| narrator | person | 189 | View Entity |
| Warren | person | 34 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017191.jpg
This document is page 104 of a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) recounting a Supreme Court oral argument regarding the film 'I Am Curious (Yellow).' The author details a contentious exchange with Chief Justice Warren Burger regarding a 'bear-baiting' analogy, harshly criticizing Burger's intelligence and judicial performance. The text also references the subsequent 'Miller v. California' decision in June 1973.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Sgt Frick and the narrator interviewed a 16-year-old female and her parents at their home. The girl was alleged to have "worked" for Jeff Epstein but denied any inappropriate encounters.
2005-10-03 • Witness's home
Det Dawson and the narrator conducted a sworn, taped interview with a witness who stated she was taken to a house by an acquaintance at age 17.
2005-10-04 • Witness's home
Supreme Court case Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton, addressing prosecutorial power and responsibility.
1987-01-01 • U.S.
The narrator gave a man a massage lasting 30-45 minutes. The man touched himself, then left the room to retrieve money, returning to pay the narrator $300.
Date unknown • Unspecified House
After being paid, the narrator got lost trying to leave the large house, encountered 'the lady' downstairs, and then left.
Date unknown • Unspecified House
The narrator got into a car with two other people and was questioned about the payment she received.
Date unknown • Car
Incident involving a man 'going after' the narrator.
2003-01-01 • Unknown
Supreme Court case U.S. v. Russell, addressing outrageous conduct by law enforcement.
1973-01-01 • U.S.
Consultations with two different therapists regarding BDSM.
Date unknown • Therapists' offices
Drunken party where Andrew initiates physical contact and confesses feelings.
Date unknown • Party
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event