Event Details
January 01, 1987
Description
Supreme Court case Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton, addressing prosecutorial power and responsibility.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court Justices | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026282.jpg
This document, from a House Oversight file, presents a legal argument that the special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller was tainted from its origin. It cites an inspector general's report on Peter Strzok's text messages as evidence of bias that cast a 'cloud' over the FBI's 'Crossfire' investigation, arguing the entire effort became 'fruit of a poisonous tree.' The author supports this due process violation claim with several Supreme Court precedents regarding prosecutorial and judicial bias. The document does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case U.S. v. Russell, addressing outrageous conduct by law enforcement.
1973-01-01 • U.S.
Supreme Court creates new rule regarding 'reckless disregard' and vacates death penalty for Tison brothers.
Date unknown • Washington D.C. / Arizona
Oral argument for 'I Am Curious Yellow' case
Date unknown • Supreme Court
Supreme Court ruling in Santobello v. New York
1971-01-01 • Washington D.C.
Vacating of Bill Cosby's convictions
2020-01-01 • Pennsylvania
Author argued his first case before the Supreme Court representing Grove Press regarding obscenity laws.
Date unknown • Supreme Court
Supreme Court of Florida order denying discretionary review in Epstein v. Edwards.
2017-06-09 • Florida Supreme Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event