Event Details
December 12, 2002
Description
A package was picked up for shipment.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| J. Epstein | person | 28 | View Entity |
| JANE | person | 1277 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00019163.jpg
This document is a court transcript from the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning concerns an invoice detailing package shipments in December 2002. One shipment on December 12, 2002, was sent by "J. Epstein" to a recipient pseudonymously called "Jane," and the questioner clarifies that this sender is not Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00013580.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell. The questioning focuses on an invoice detailing package shipments from 2002, establishing that J. Epstein sent a package to a recipient referred to as "Jane" on December 12, 2002. The testimony explicitly clarifies that the sender was not Ghislaine Maxwell, and also mentions a separate FedEx shipment from December 9, 2002.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.
Date unknown
A meeting involving the witness (Jane) and Epstein.
1994-01-01 • Unknown
Filing of the court transcript regarding sentencing calculations.
2022-08-22 • Court (Southern District)
Trip to New York to see The Lion King
Date unknown • New York
A trip to New Mexico involving Jane.
Date unknown • New Mexico
Jane's trip to Epstein's ranch in New Mexico, which she testified occurred when she was '15 or 16'.
Date unknown • Epstein's ranch in New Mexico
A trip taken by Jane to New Mexico, allegedly for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity.
Date unknown • New Mexico
A return trip taken by Jane from New Mexico, during which Mr. Epstein was not present.
Date unknown • New Mexico
A trial where the Government presented evidence, including Jane's testimony, and the jury was instructed by the District Court.
Date unknown • District Court
A trial where the Defendant is arguing she suffered prejudice due to a delay in prosecution.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event