Event Details

Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

2014-02-24 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Defendant David Parse’s Motion For Judgment Of Acquittal Pursuant To Rule 29

2011-06-07

Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness (Edelstein) that there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.

Date unknown

A phone call with the Court.

0015-07-01

A discussion about whether to bring information about a juror to the Court's attention, resulting in a decision not to do so and not to investigate further.

Date unknown • the park

David Parse was convicted on charges related to backdating, though the jury did not convict on the conspiracy charge.

2011-05-24

A question-and-answer session (likely a deposition or court testimony) where Edelstein questions a witness about the identity of 'Catherine Conrad,' specifically whether two individuals with that name, one being 'Juror No. 1,' are the same person. The discussion includes the role of Theresa Trzaskoma and the firm's awareness of information regarding Juror No. 1's identity and responses to voir dire.

2022-02-24 • Implied to be within the Southern District, possibly New York

Multiple letters sent from Daniel Aronoff to David Parse.

2000-12-19

David Parse swears to the document before a notary.

2012-08-03 • Illinois

Examination of Ms. Edelstein by Mr. Okula regarding the firm's knowledge of facts related to a government note and a Catherine Conrad letter, and the ethical implications of a motion decision. The witness is excused at the end of the excerpt.

Date unknown • Southern District