Event Details

January 01, 2000

Description

Legal precedent established in United States v. Andreas regarding third-party beneficiaries of plea agreements.

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00000254.tif

Legal Document/Court Filing (excerpt) • 41.8 KB
View

This document is an excerpt from a legal filing arguing that a 'Petitioner' should be covered by an immunity clause in a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein's offenses. It asserts that the NPA's broad language intended to cover unnamed co-conspirators, including individuals like Ghislaine Maxwell who were known to Epstein's circle or might later be identified. The argument cites legal precedents to support the Petitioner's claim for immunity.

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
7th Circuit
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
0
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-12-26 15:03

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00000254.tif
Date String
2000

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event