Event Details

This page from a legal appellate brief (Case 22-1426, dated Feb 28, 2023) argues two main points regarding the Defendant's conviction and sentencing. First, it claims the Court failed to correct a juror misunderstanding regarding 'Count Four,' specifically whether the illegal sexual activity involving victim 'Jane' had to occur in New York versus New Mexico. Second, it argues the sentencing guidelines were miscalculated, specifically disputing an 'aggravating role adjustment' regarding the supervision of another criminal participant.

This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Document 621) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 25, 2022. The text is a legal argument refuting the defense's interpretation of a jury note regarding accomplice liability and flight arrangements. It specifically addresses the victim 'Jane', debating whether Maxwell arranged her return flight from New Mexico and discussing corroborating evidence in flight logs versus commercial flight records.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the summation by Ms. Moe (likely the prosecution). The text focuses on the testimony of Dr. Rocchio, an expert in the psychology of sexual trauma, explaining why victims (specifically Jane) delay disclosure or only provide partial details initially. Ms. Moe argues that Jane's behavior is consistent with 'textbook' child sexual abuse and highlights that Jane's testimony is corroborated by three other witnesses: Annie, Carolyn, and Kate.

This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Document 647) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 11, 2022. The text argues that the jury was confused regarding the jurisdiction of New York state laws applied to conduct (sexual abuse of 'Jane') that occurred in New Mexico. The defense contends that the Court erred by declining a proposed supplemental instruction that would have clarified that Count Four requires an intent to violate New York law within New York, not merely sexual activity in New Mexico.