Date Unknown
A proposed brief hearing, outside the presence of the jury, to examine Mr. Glassman about his communications.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| the parties | person | 4 | View Entity |
| Mr. Glassman | person | 49 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00008209.jpg
This legal document, dated December 3, 2021, is a filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The author argues that Ms. Maxwell has a constitutional right to call Mr. Glassman as a witness to question him about advice he gave to a person named Jane regarding cooperation with the government. The argument posits that any attorney-client privilege was waived when Mr. Glassman disclosed this advice, and that this testimony is crucial for Ms. Maxwell's defense.
Events with shared participants
The witness, Jane, hired an attorney, Mr. Glassman.
2019-01-01
The Lion King
Date unknown • Unspecified
The witness received initial advice from Mr. Glassman before a victims' compensation fund was established.
Date unknown
Jane hired a different attorney, Mr. Glassman.
Date unknown
Deadline for parties to submit proposed questions for the inquiry into Juror 50.
2022-03-01
Prospective jurors completed a lengthy questionnaire and underwent in-person voir dire, from which the District Court empaneled a jury.
Date unknown
A future public hearing is planned to inquire into whether Juror 50's answers were false.
Date unknown
Presentation of closing arguments and jury instructions.
2021-12-20 • courtroom
A hearing on potential juror misconduct involving Juror 50, mentioned in a footnote.
Date unknown • District Court
Presentation of closing argument and jury instructions scheduled for the day after the document was filed.
2021-12-20 • courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event