Event Details
Unspecified
Description
The Lion King
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Glassman | person | 49 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00016758.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Ms. Comey and Ms. Menninger discuss with the Court the admissibility of testimony and specific emails involving Mr. Glassman (referencing 'The Lion King') and Mr. Rossmiller. The discussion centers on a prior ruling limiting testimony from attorneys to specific statements regarding whether testifying would help the defendant's case.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The witness, Jane, hired an attorney, Mr. Glassman.
2019-01-01
The witness received initial advice from Mr. Glassman before a victims' compensation fund was established.
Date unknown
Jane hired a different attorney, Mr. Glassman.
Date unknown
A proposed brief hearing, outside the presence of the jury, to examine Mr. Glassman about his communications.
Date unknown • Court
Ms. Maxwell's legal team requests permission from the Court to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman as witnesses, after the government refused to stipulate to their testimony.
2021-12-13 • Court
A series of settlement negotiations involving Jane's claim, including an offer from the EVCP and demands from Mr. Glassman to the EVCP and Ms. Maxwell.
Date unknown
Jane's first meeting with the government.
2019-09-19
Jane hired Mr. Glassman.
2019-09-03
A judge is ruling on the admissibility of testimony from attorneys, permitting one specific question to be asked of Mr. Glassman.
2022-08-10
A judge rules to permit one specific question to be asked of Mr. Glassman regarding what he told the government about his communications with a witness named Jane.
2022-08-10 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event