Event Details
Unspecified
Description
Cross-examination
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor Victim-4 | person | 122 | View Entity |
| Defense | organization | 240 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00005573.jpg
This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) discusses the court's ruling on the anonymity of 'Minor Victim-4' during trial. The court rejects the defense's argument that using the victim's real name is necessary for impeachment or to address allegations of suborning perjury. The ruling allows the defense to use the victim's first name and show unredacted exhibits to the jury, but prohibits saying the victim's last name out loud in court.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.
2021-01-31
Tentative trial date set by the court.
2020-06-08 • Courtroom
A trial where the Government plans to use certain statements and evidence, which is the subject of the defense's motion.
Date unknown
The defense submitted a financial report showing the defendant has approximately $22 million in assets.
Date unknown • Court
A rebuttal is given by Ms. Comey in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Date unknown • Court
Government's motion, which the defense is largely ignoring precedent for
Date unknown
The Government provided the defense with comprehensive Jencks Act material for trial witnesses and its exhibits, along with a letter.
2021-10-11
The document discusses arguments and evidence to be presented at an upcoming trial, including the Government's intention to argue certain individuals are co-conspirators.
Date unknown
The defense submitted a financial report reflecting the defendant's assets.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event