Event Details
December 18, 2007
Description
An Opinion Per Curiam and order of the Court was entered, which included a finding of non-cooperation.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conrad | person | 113 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009446.jpg
This legal document from a New York court in 2010 details a ruling in the case of "In re Conrad." The court denies the respondent's motion for reinstatement to the practice of law but does so without prejudice, allowing for a future motion. The respondent remains suspended indefinitely, effective nunc pro tunc to December 18, 2007, but a previous finding of non-cooperation from that date is vacated.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Direct examination of juror/witness Conrad regarding her conduct during voir dire.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir dire (jury selection) commenced for the trial.
2011-03-01 • Courtroom
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Jury deliberations during which the jury sent a note inquiring about the proper basis to convict under Count Four.
Date unknown
The document is an argument concerning the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell, specifically regarding the application of guideline § 4B1.5.
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event