DOJ-OGR-00009446.jpg
340 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
340 KB
Summary
This legal document from a New York court in 2010 details a ruling in the case of "In re Conrad." The court denies the respondent's motion for reinstatement to the practice of law but does so without prejudice, allowing for a future motion. The respondent remains suspended indefinitely, effective nunc pro tunc to December 18, 2007, but a previous finding of non-cooperation from that date is vacated.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Conrad | Respondent |
Mentioned in the case name "In re Conrad" and referred to as "respondent" throughout the document concerning suspensi...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | Government Agency |
The judicial body that issued the order to suspend the respondent, deny the cross motion, and vacate a finding of non...
|
| Thomson Reuters | Company |
Mentioned in the copyright notice at the bottom of the page: "© 2011 Thomson Reuters."
|
Timeline (4 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction where the respondent was suspended from the practice of law.
|
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,145 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE-umDocument 16166320 Filed 02/24/22 Page 27 of 117
A-5842
A-5842
Page 3
80 A.D.3d 168, 913 N.Y.S.2d 187, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 09090
(Cite as: 80 A.D.3d 168, 913 N.Y.S.2d 187)
(Cite as: 80 A.D.3d 168, 913 N.Y.S.2d 187)
nite period until further order of this Court, nunc pro tunc to December 18, 2007, and the branch of respondent's cross motion seeking reinstatement to the practice of law should be denied without prejudice to a further motion for the same relief, supported by an expert's evaluation attesting to her present fitness to practice law.
Respondent suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York for an indefinite period until further order of this Court, effective nunc pro tunc to December 18, 2007. Cross motion denied, without prejudice to a further motion, as indicated. So much of the Opinion Per Curiam and order of this Court entered on December 18, 2007 (M-4837) incorporating a finding of non-cooperation vacated, as indicated.
All concur.
N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., 2010.
In re Conrad
80 A.D.3d 168, 913 N.Y.S.2d 187, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 09090
In re Conrad
80 A.D.3d 168, 913 N.Y.S.2d 187, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 09090
END OF DOCUMENT
© 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
6-3
DOJ-OGR-00009446
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document