Event Details
January 01, 2010
Description
A dissenting opinion was issued by the author in the case of J. Picini Flooring, 356 NLRB No. 9.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Board | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Author of the text | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Author | person | 163 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022313.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, containing a dissenting opinion regarding a new rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The author argues the rule, which compels employers to post notices of employee rights, is a flawed and unauthorized attempt to increase union density. The document also details the Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis, which estimates a minimal compliance cost for businesses, a figure contested by industry commenters. The content of this specific document does not pertain to Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Publication of the book 'Inquest: The Warren Commission and the Establishment of Truth'.
1966-01-01 • New York
Publication of the book 'Agency of Fear'.
1977-01-01 • New York
Publication of the book 'Deception: The Invisible War Between the KGB and the CIA'.
1989-01-01 • New York
Publication of the book 'James Jesus Angleton: Was He Right'.
2011-01-01 • New York
The author and journalist Te-Ping Chen interviewed staff at the Mira hotel regarding Snowden.
2013-06-01 • Mira hotel
Author and Andrew broke up, got back together, and broke up again.
Date unknown • Unknown
Publication of a Federal Register notice containing rules and regulations, including a dissenting opinion on a new labor rule.
2011-08-30 • USA
Publication of a final rule in the Federal Register regarding an employer notice-posting requirement. The document details the Board's response to public comments received during the rulemaking process.
2011-08-30 • N/A (Federal publication)
The author states 'I visited' but the sentence is cut off, so the location and context of the visit are unknown.
Date unknown • Not specified
The author attended the 'Forbidden Research conference' where political discussions took place, including topics about democracy, Trump, and diversity.
Date unknown • Not specified
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event