Date Unknown
The court declined a request from the defense for a hearing and to order a videotape to be turned over.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defense | organization | 240 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00001416.jpg
This legal document excerpt details the defense's arguments on behalf of Ms. Maxwell regarding her treatment at MDC Brooklyn. The defense claims the government and court are unfairly handling evidence, specifically a videotape of an incident that would allegedly disprove statements made by MDC staff. The document also highlights the defense's frustration with the court's dismissal of their complaints about jail conditions, such as guards flashing a light in Ms. Maxwell's cell every 15 minutes.
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Tentative trial date set by the court.
2020-06-08 • Courtroom
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
A trial where the Government plans to use certain statements and evidence, which is the subject of the defense's motion.
Date unknown
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
The defense submitted a financial report showing the defendant has approximately $22 million in assets.
Date unknown • Court
A rebuttal is given by Ms. Comey in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Date unknown • Court
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Government's motion, which the defense is largely ignoring precedent for
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event