Historical (referenced in testimony)
Classic psychology study regarding traffic signs (Stop vs Yield)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed study participants ('people') | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Collaborators/Sympathizers | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Loftus | person | 198 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00016596.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the 'misinformation effect' in memory science, describing experiments where witnesses to simulated accidents incorporate false post-event information (such as a yield sign replacing a stop sign) into their memories, rendering them inaccurate.
Events with shared participants
A brain-imaging experiment was conducted to study how people's brains process choices. Participants were asked to choose between two equally-rated travel destinations, and their brain activity and subsequent ratings of the destinations were monitored.
Date unknown • Not specified
Functional MRI study (citation 10) referenced in text regarding empathy responses to individuals with AIDS.
Date unknown
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Experiments conducted by Loftus involving videos of car crashes and people being lost in malls.
Date unknown • malls
Studies conducted by Loftus involving interviews with people who were sexually abused about their memories.
Date unknown
Direct examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory, trauma, and confidence.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A research study, detailed in a 1995 paper, where researchers attempted to implant a false memory in participants. The study involved telling subjects one false story (being lost in a shopping mall) alongside three true stories from their childhood.
1995-01-01
A cross-examination of a witness named Loftus regarding their use of testimony from high-profile cases for marketing and financial gain.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
A witness named Loftus is questioned under oath about her expertise in the science of memory, her history of testifying, and the scope of her knowledge compared to a neuroscientist.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the psychology of traumatic memory as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Southern District Court (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event