Event Details
August 10, 2022
Description
Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony, and a defense response concerning a witness. The court also references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
Participants (7)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent Young | person | 19 | View Entity |
| Alexander Hamilton | person | 19 | View Entity |
| Dr. Loftus | person | 80 | View Entity |
| MR. ROHRBACH | person | 523 | View Entity |
| Ms. Sternheim | person | 877 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records a discussion during a hearing concerning the relevance of Dr. Loftus's opinions, Agent Young's testimony, and a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony. The court also addresses a defense response regarding a witness and references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Jury Deliberation/Instruction
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Initial bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, which was held 12 days after her arrest.
Date unknown
Witness entered an appearance in a specific case pro hac vice.
Date unknown • Southern District of Florida
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event