DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
546 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
10
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
546 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records a discussion during a hearing concerning the relevance of Dr. Loftus's opinions, Agent Young's testimony, and a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony. The court also addresses a defense response regarding a witness and references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Loftus |
opinions on suggestive questioning techniques are being discussed
|
|
| Agent Young | Agent |
testimony is being discussed
|
| Mr. Rohrbach |
speaking in court, responding on behalf of the government
|
|
| Ms. Sternheim |
speaking in court, making a comment and a request
|
|
| Alexander Hamilton |
motion to preclude his testimony is being discussed
|
|
| The Court | Judge |
presiding over the hearing, making rulings and asking questions
|
| witness | witness |
defense response regarding this witness is being discussed
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | government agency |
general views on Agent Young's testimony, represented by Mr. Rohrbach
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
court reporting service for the proceedings
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton's testimony, and a defense response concerning a witness. The court also references a legal precedent from 'Hamilton in Federal '78'.
Key Quotes (10)
"believes to be an example of suggestion. This testimony provides a sufficient basis for the jury to consider the relevance of Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning techniques. So that's my basis for that ruling."Source
— The Court
(Explaining the basis for a ruling regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions.)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't know the government's general views on Agent Young's testimony and I don't need to reach a conclusion on that for purposes of this ruling. So I don't have further guidance on that now."Source
— The Court
(Stating the court's position on Agent Young's testimony and the government's views.)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
Quote #2
"Nothing from the government, your Honor."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Responding to the court's question about further questions.)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
Quote #3
"Nothing at this time."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Responding to the court's question about further questions.)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
Quote #4
"Okay. Thank you."Source
— THE COURT
(Acknowledging the responses from counsel.)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
Quote #5
"Motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton testimony."Source
— THE COURT
(Announcing a motion being considered.)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
Quote #6
"We'd like to get Broadway tickets for everyone. That's the best we can do."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(A seemingly lighthearted comment or request made in court.)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
Quote #7
"It really is -- yes. It was Hamilton in Federal '78 that said, We just have judgment, not will nor force, just judgment. So I guess this calls for judgment."Source
— THE COURT
(Referencing a legal precedent to explain a point about judgment.)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
Quote #8
"So I have the defense response with respect to this witness that came in at 12:31 a.m. this morning. I haven't had a chance to work through the issue yet."Source
— THE COURT
(Discussing the status of a defense response regarding a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
Quote #9
"What's the timing on this witness?"Source
— THE COURT
(Asking for clarification on the schedule for a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00013878.jpg
Quote #10
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,334 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 19 of 246 2314
1 believes to be an example of suggestion. This testimony
2 provides a sufficient basis for the jury to consider the
3 relevance of Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning
4 techniques. So that's my basis for that ruling.
5 There was argument regarding Agent Young testimony
6 that -- I don't know the government's general views on Agent
7 Young's testimony and I don't need to reach a conclusion on
8 that for purposes of this ruling. So I don't have further
9 guidance on that now.
10 All right. Questions on that?
11 MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government, your
12 Honor.
13 MS. STERNHEIM: Nothing at this time.
14 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.
15 All right. Motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton
16 testimony.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: We'd like to get Broadway tickets for
18 everyone. That's the best we can do.
19 THE COURT: It really is -- yes. It was Hamilton in
20 Federal '78 that said, We just have judgment, not will nor
21 force, just judgment. So I guess this calls for judgment.
22 So I have the defense response with respect to this
23 witness that came in at 12:31 a.m. this morning. I haven't had
24 a chance to work through the issue yet.
25 What's the timing on this witness?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013878
1 believes to be an example of suggestion. This testimony
2 provides a sufficient basis for the jury to consider the
3 relevance of Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning
4 techniques. So that's my basis for that ruling.
5 There was argument regarding Agent Young testimony
6 that -- I don't know the government's general views on Agent
7 Young's testimony and I don't need to reach a conclusion on
8 that for purposes of this ruling. So I don't have further
9 guidance on that now.
10 All right. Questions on that?
11 MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government, your
12 Honor.
13 MS. STERNHEIM: Nothing at this time.
14 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.
15 All right. Motion to preclude Alexander Hamilton
16 testimony.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: We'd like to get Broadway tickets for
18 everyone. That's the best we can do.
19 THE COURT: It really is -- yes. It was Hamilton in
20 Federal '78 that said, We just have judgment, not will nor
21 force, just judgment. So I guess this calls for judgment.
22 So I have the defense response with respect to this
23 witness that came in at 12:31 a.m. this morning. I haven't had
24 a chance to work through the issue yet.
25 What's the timing on this witness?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013878
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document