June 28, 2004
In United States v. Bodmer, the court set conditions of bail for a defendant who had consented to extradition.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bodmer | person | 34 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00020091.jpg
This page from a legal document analyzes several precedent cases to argue for or against the detention of a defendant pending trial. It distinguishes the current case from others like *Khashoggi* and *Bodmer* where defendants were released, and draws parallels to cases like *Boustani*, *Patrick Ho*, and *Epstein* where defendants were detained. The analysis focuses on factors such as flight risk, financial resources, ties to foreign countries, and the existence of extradition treaties.
Events with shared participants
Discussion of the legal case 'U.S. v. Bodmer'
Date unknown
The case of United States v. Bodmer, where the defendant was released to home confinement with GPS monitoring despite the government's argument based on speculation.
2004-01-28 • S.D.N.Y.
United States v. Bodmer, where bail was set for a defendant who had consented to extradition, with the court finding the government's argument about financial resources was speculative.
2004-06-28 • S.D.N.Y.
Decision in the case of United States v. Bodmer.
2004-01-28 • S.D.N.Y.
United States v. Bodmer, No. 03 Cr. 947 (SAS), 2004 WL 169790 (S.D.N.Y. June 28, 2004)
2004-06-28 • Southern District of New York
United States v. Bodmer ruling
2004-06-28 • S.D.N.Y.
United States v. Bodmer decision
2004-06-28 • S.D.N.Y.
Bodmer case proceedings
2004-01-01 • United States Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event